Spotify Hit With $1.6 Billion USD Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

Over a fifth of the service’s songs are involved.

Music
12,223 Hypes 0 Comments

More money, more problems. Following recent news concerning Spotify’s increased valuation, the popular streaming service has been hit with a $1.6 billion USD copyright lawsuit.

As The Hollywood Reporter reveals, Spotify‘s new legal battle stems from claims by Wixen Music Publishing, the outfit behind Rage Against the Machine’s Zach De La Rocha and Tom Morello, The Black Keys’ Dan Auerbach, Tom Petty, Weezer’s Rivers Cuomo, Neil Young, Stevie Nicks, Sonic Youth’s Kim Gordon and many other high-profile musicians. In Wixen’s lawsuit, the company alleges that Spotify is using records such as The Doors’ “Light My Fire” and Petty’s “Free Fallin” without proper compensation or licensing license.

“The Settlement Agreement is procedurally and substantively unfair to Settlement Class Members because it prevents meaningful participation by rights holders and offers them an unfair dollar amount in light of Spotify’s ongoing, willful copyright infringement of their works,” reads a statement from Wixen. “Spotify brazenly disregards United States copyright law and has committed willful, ongoing copyright infringement… Wixen notified Spotify that it had neither obtained a direct or compulsory mechanical license for the use of the works. For these reasons and the foregoing, Wixen is entitled to the maximum statutory relief.” In the official complaint, Wixen claims that “as much as 21 percent of the 30 million songs on Spotify” do not carry the necessary license.

Having filed the necessary court papers this past Friday, Spotify’s team of lawyers have also “sent a letter to its clients stating that it would submit Requests for Exclusion in their names unless—within a short time frame—the client affirmatively provided Wixen Music with contrary instructions. But that letter does not confer the requisite authority on Wixen Music. In sending the letters, Wixen Music effectively assumed that the recipients’ silence would grant it the power to opt the recipients out of the certified class. But that approach is contrary to law: because the right to opt out of a class action is an individual right, any attempt to exercise that right without express authorization is invalid.”

You can read through Wixen’s entire claim here. Spotify faced similar lawsuits in 2017 and 2016.

Read Full Article
Source
The Hollywood Reporter
Image Credit
Photothek via Getty Images
More

What to Read Next

Christopher Nolan's 'Dunkirk' Reimagined as Black & White Silent Film
Entertainment

Christopher Nolan's 'Dunkirk' Reimagined as Black & White Silent Film

Clocking in at 8 minutes.

adidas Quietly Debuts Lucas Puig's Signature Sneaker in New Colorways
Footwear

adidas Quietly Debuts Lucas Puig's Signature Sneaker in New Colorways

The low-key skate shoe has returned.

Off-White™'s Holiday 2017 Collection Gets Spotlighted in New Editorial
Fashion

Off-White™'s Holiday 2017 Collection Gets Spotlighted in New Editorial

Casual offerings swathed in the brand’s signature motifs.


Cav Empt Unwraps New MD Sphere Scarf for Spring/Summer 2018
Fashion

Cav Empt Unwraps New MD Sphere Scarf for Spring/Summer 2018

Adorned with technological motifs.

Acne Studios Reworks Jodhpur Boot With Crepe Sole
Footwear

Acne Studios Reworks Jodhpur Boot With Crepe Sole

Luxurious and comfortable.

'Jeopardy!' Contestant Mispronounces Coolio's “Gangsta’s Paradise," Loses $3,200 USD
Music

'Jeopardy!' Contestant Mispronounces Coolio's “Gangsta’s Paradise," Loses $3,200 USD

Always keep it gangsta.

More ▾