Thom Browne for Supreme | Hypebeast

It’s nice that streetwear is growing up with all of us. As all of us maturing and actually gaining appreciation for high-end fashion they are mixing.

so many comments!!

1. i like thom browne! you feel like a giant because his pants are cut shorter
2. i love chambray!!!
3. i hype so.. i like supreme

but if you wanna get this look, like some of the other commenters have said you can probably get the look for a lot cheaper

but if you got money in your pocket, why not!

no matter is Thom Browne or not, I don’t like the fit. and if u can pull that look off, it will be cool. not everyone looks good in Thom Browne. and dont hate the street cats just coz u wear a tuxedo to dinner.

These shirts are supposed to be tucked in, that’s why they are cut the way the fit in the pics. That patch is a detail on all of TB shirts, and you don’t see it when the shirt is tucked. But I bet all you hypebeasts will purposely wear it untucked to show off the patch like a New Era size sticker.

Remember when you just got stuff because you liked it and it didn’t matter who did it?
All of this collaboration stuff is stoopid. Now days it’s all about who collabs with who and how limited it is. LAME!

I mean …. thom browne x supreme and everything you can get it’s 3 oxford chambrey that I can get at AA in the same colors for 50 €

SMH ….
don’t get me wrong , shirts are not bad but I expected more

You guys should not take this so serious. there are people who don’t know who Thom Browne is. even though he is one of the best tailors in the world and he worked for Ralph Lauren’s subsequent label Club Monaco for a number of years. I like the colab, it’s cool to know that some high end designers like Thom are not to stuck up to work with streetwear guys.

I love the collaboration. I do see why some of you are upset with it. Supreme’s core street wear audience might not really like the fit, but street wear and men”s contemporary are mixing and mixing fast. The days of just a dope tshirt grafic, new era fitted, hoodies, and varsity jackets are over. This is the direction of street wear people. Get used to it. That core audience is growing up and their look is becoming more refined.

Just saw Thom Browne speak at FIT. Someone asked him how this collaboration came about. He replied there was no collaboration they just bought the shirts from him.

the kids on here talking about thom browne and supreme is whack are probably 16 dress like a man and you probably would know thats a great fitting shirt and its history behind the patch on a oxford. dumbasses

Design wise it’s worth maybe $50, but because it’s Supreme/Thom Browne collab. it’ll probably get mark up another $200. Total disappointment, the only way I would get it is if it’s $20 or less or free.

Posted by:reg on March 22, 2010 at 5:27 pm

“who cares if its high end or not. its thom browne for SUPREME which is a streetwear brand. i dont need to know sh*t about thom browne or high end fashion you snobby douches”
.
.
.
.
which is why you don’t know shit period. This type of reasoning is why people are wondering why it fits this way, why it cost so much, why there is a patch, or why they even collabed. thats the problem with you consumers, you don’t want to look into the things you are purchasing.

@reg

And that’s why you are a poser. If you dont know anything that’s behind the brand or callabo or what not, then you are sheep. You will probably buy Supreme x Maxi Pads because it says Supreme. What a joke. It’s ok though, Supreme loves you. You are the reason they make a lot of money

Thom Browne is a very high end brand that makes button down shirts in NYC. This is a weird collaboration. I can’t imagine why they thought this would sell (except the fact that it says Supreme on the bottom) because these shirts are normally $300-700 a shirt.

who cares if its high end or not. its thom browne for SUPREME which is a streetwear brand. i dont need to know sh*t about thom browne or high end fashion you snobby douches.

you retards don’t know shit about fashion,. Thats how the shirt is supposed to fit. Try looking up a Thom Brown Season For a fucking change.

its quite entertaining how poorly educated on high end fashion you retards are.

thom browne for supreme was like the oddest email title ive ever gotten, this is crazy dope though

is Thom Browne a high-end brand?? if it’s under $80, i’ll definitely cop it!

Goes to show how far Supreme is going. Crushed it with the A.P.C. and now the Thom Browne. I wouldn’t be surprised if they did a Margiela collab next. I’m digging the Chambray shirt, Chambray is definitley going to pop this season.

Goes to show how far Supreme is going. Crushed it with the A.P.C. and now the Thom Browne. I wouldn’t be surprised if they did a Margiela collab next. I’m digging the Chambray shirt, Chambray is definitley going to pop this season.

Another example of slapping a Supreme label on some garbage clothing.

Only for the rich $$$

Boring, at this point Supreme will slap their name on any piece of sh*t, sell it for a 600% markup and call it the second coming of christ. I really don’t understand why people keep buying stuff from them, i blame it on the japanese…

Personally, I think the body is a bit toooo slim. the work shirt is the trend, duno how much they gona cost, or Uniqlo will be a choice as they have the work shirts as a stable and in good cuts.

urgh. worst fit ever.

so fucking ill

Hmmmmmmm, I dont know how I feel about this

pretty nice, wonder what retail is

so did they run out of ideas on where to slap “supreme” on this shirt? or are you just really really not supposed to tuck it in?

worst collaboration up tp date.
are you serious?
i can’t imagine any skater wearing this shit

cool. huf did this. dqm did this. and american apparel has BEEN doing this. those are three facts not a single person can deny. all you’re buying here is that stupid white patch at the bottom. go to american apparel, yeah sure its still expensive but not as expensive as this shit will be.

Maybe it’s just Jason Dill’s voluptuous, womanly hips, but that cut looks shit?