Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1

March 4, 2009Uncategorizedby Eugene Kan11 Views

panasonic-lumic-dmc-gh1-1

Launched last year and offering a new option for those wanting some of the features of a traditional DSLR body in a more compact package, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 and its four-thirds format were arguably the front-runners as more camera brands look to travel down the more compact route. However in recent memory thanks to the Canon 5D Mark II and the Nikon D90, high-definition video has become a new sought-after feature in DSLR-style cameras, combining stunning quality with the versatility of interchangeable lenses. An update to the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 now yields a full high-def version which shoots 1080p @ 24 fps or 720p @ 60 fps, framed with a 3-inch LCD screen or digital viewfinder. Some other notables alongside this release are a new “video optimized” 14-140 mm f/4.0-5.8 lens (read: quiet) and a “Creative Mode” which allows for instantaneous aperture and exposure control during recording. As the online world moves to new forms of digital communication, video playback through new innovations like these will arguably be the mainstay in just a short little while.

Source: Gizmodo

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • doppelgänger

    I think adding a video function to a DSLR is a pleasant add-on, but still almost an overkill. We buy DSLRs for its performance on stills, not for the (new) video functions. If you wanna take videos, get a proper video camera.

    Besides, coming out with such whack colours really don’t appeal to me. It makes it look so cheesy. In any case, I am a Canon user and I think Canon and/or Nikon is the only way to go. Panasonic? No, thanks. I think a Sony would probably do better than a Lumix.

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • gt

    i know full hd video is nice but disappointed with lens! 14-105 4 – 5.8! come on! whats next? 28 – 200 with higher aperture?

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Holy Zoo

    D90 for video – I rented it for a pro video shoot, and although I got gorgeous images with it, the rolling shutter was horrid, and the image really is lacking in sharpness. It was worth renting. Not worth buying. The game is changing so fast, it’s worth waiting for the manufacturer who gets this RIGHT. Nikon has not.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Jason P.

    Nice camera, much better than a D90 in my mind. D90 does 720p with manual focus only- lame. Now if Olympus comes out with this in one of their regular sized bodies I will purchase it immediately. The new Olympus E-620 and E-30 are very nice, just add HD.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.

  • Eugen Kahn

    I won’t buy it, much rather go straight for D90 baby. DSLR FTMFW.