I know many might not have the same views as showed in this video. blushing But I still encourage you to give input on the content and the visuals.

Replied in The Enemy Is At Your Heels, 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Embed content] What do you think?

Started by The Enemy Is At Your Heels, 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Embed content] Made with a couple of friends and part of a Christian Ministry. Tell me what you think.

Started by Created My First Short Film! The Enemy Is At Your Heels, 2 Weeks ago in Arts

[Image]

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] yeh i kno that..was just wonderin if being based and illuminated was the new thing as for everybody

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

yo whats with everyone having based in there names? I thought you guys said based god was wack? is this a new movement now in cali?

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] lol yeh i was thinking that, he gotta be residing in alaska. still nice fit tho.

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] i took ur advice I toned it down this morning.smokeyface just wanted to see how you guys would react.

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

revised for the morning top= nada

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] dont want to be showin people my boxers bro, and besides that was not even why I got them i just like the double stacks. And with the tee under the v neck thing is that real big pet peeve? Cuz i've seen many people do it that way. Not to sound homo but does it look that much better without a shirt under?

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

full picture [Image]

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] dont see how they look the same, but ok I get where your coming from.smokeyface

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] lol ok i understand..tongueface @lswizz my camera was blocking the top part of my vneck so you couldnt really tell the lenghth. but i'll remember your advice

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] no offense but it seems like you don't like change just normality. Sorry if i misjudged but i thought the purpose of these forums was to put a fit of something unique even if its not in your taste. Now if i followed what you suggested what would be the point of posting if it must be something uniformed and accustomed to? I understand your take on my fit but what I dont understand is your mindset on nothing different, everything must follow by this. Isnt that what this forum is about creativity? My bad if i got the wrong idea.

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic

[Quote] is that how you feel..smh thanks for your opinion tho man if its that bad i'll take it off(dont see what the problem issmokeyface) its ur opinion so i'll respect that.

Replied in WDYWT: 2010 (Chat Edition) (Flaming fit is fine. Flame person = Infraction), 2 Weeks ago in Off Topic