Good Portable Speaker?

April 10, 2014 @ 19:35:24
anybody know of a good portable speaker, preferably one with bluetooth connectivity? i'm really not looking to shell out more than ~$60 and i'm really looking for something that doesn't get that nasty muddy sound when you turn the volume all the way up on a song that has a lot of bass in it.
April 11, 2014 @ 02:31:10
bose mini soundlink it's $200 but worth it
April 11, 2014 @ 06:37:34
Jawbone jambox is great

This post is hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

April 29, 2014 @ 03:19:59
It'll be really hard to find good portable speakers, especially for cheap.  I'm not gonna assume why you're looking for one, but your money might be better invested in some nice headphones or actual speakers.

3 posts are hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

October 28, 2014 @ 07:28:38
x-mini is good & cheap
March 02, 2015 @ 02:44:51
The skull candy portable speaker is pretty good.

2 posts are hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

May 10, 2015 @ 08:16:17
for the price you're looking for a wide range of speakers meet that criteria. the trade off is going to be in quality. the muddy sound you are referring to is going to based off the materials used on the speaker. a cheaper speaker with a higher overall volume will undoubtedly produce a muddy sound relatively quickly. i would spring the extra 40 and get a mini jambox. overall it won't be as loud as a jbl speaker or UE, but the decibel rating will be higher and quality of music will come through cleaner for longer. but no speaker sub 100 is going to last forever.

2 posts are hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

May 15, 2015 @ 00:58:22
What can we do to restore racial harmony to our cities? The problem lies in the Negro's desperately low intelligence. With an average IQ of 85, nearly a full standard deviation from the mean, the Negro lacks the intellectual wherewithal to succeed in a white society, yet has been led - cruelly and unfairly - to consider itself as on a par with humans. The irony is bitter: the Negro is so stupid it doesn't realize how stupid it is. With an IQ of 85, it believes almost anything it is told, including the lie that it is intelligent.

So the Negro sees humans living in comfortable homes, driving expensive cars, wearing good quality clothes, and not dying of AIDS; and it thinks that, since it is the equal of humans, all those material benefits are somehow its right, too. In short, the Negro is discontented because it *expects* more than it *has*. The trick to restoring the happy, smiling "Uncle Remus" Negro of yesteryear is thus to manage its expectations.

For example, if I had an IQ of 85, I'd rightly consider it an achievement to hold down a job as a toilet cleaner. However, I know this because I have an IQ between 128 and 140, depending on which IQ test I choose to believe. If I really did have an IQ of 85, I'd be far too stupid to realize that I was doing well to hold that job down - unless somebody told me so.

Similarly, the Negro who rapes a baby to cure his AIDS should be applauded, not condemned, because he's started out on the evolutionary path that leads to cognitive intelligence. What appears to us to be a gross sexual crime is, in fact, the distant ancestor of abstract thought. 50,000 years ago, humans were as dumb as Negroes are now; surely we should cut them a little slack and not judge them by the standards we set ourselves? You wouldn't expect a dog to drive a car; you wouldn't expect a chimpanzee to perform brain surgery; and you can't expect a Negro to display any moral awareness. Admittedly, applauding this behavior will accelerate the spread of AIDS, but to die of disgusting and interesting diseases is part of the Negro's birthright and heritage.

We should thus focus our efforts, as a society, on applauding the most minor Negro accomplishments, reminding him what a dim bulb he is, and emphasizing that his material lifestyle is proportionate to his IQ. He should be happy with whatever he has, however little that is, because he's too dim to merit more. Thus, an African Negro has an IQ of 55 to 60 and drinks water that has been pissed and shit in. An American Negro has an IQ of 85 and gets to drink clean water, the same as humans drink. Who's better off? Why, the latter, clearly - because of his higher IQ. The message to the discontented urban Negro is: it could be worse.

Only when the Negro forgets its preposterous dreams of getting a college degree on its own intellectual merits, or of holding down any other than a menial job, will there be racial harmony. There can be no more quota Negro doctors until they evolve past belief in the "Evil Eye". There must be no more quota Negro airline pilots until there is an African aerospace industry.


They'll be happier, we'll be happier, and best of all, my shoes will be 
May 24, 2015 @ 20:15:11
Jawbone jambox is great


agree with you.
Please login first to reply.
x