Equalled at United? Not necessarily, hold your horses with that one mate, especially as United are in a poor financial state
Why do people keep saying this? Despite the debt United is still one of the best run clubs on the planet, with the third highest rate of revenue. Unless you consider spending £50m on transfers a poor financial state.
2012: £50,000,000
2011: £52,900,000
2010: £27,200,000
2009: £21,000,000
2008: £35,750,000
2007: £61,750,000
Equalled at United? Not necessarily, hold your horses with that one mate, especially as United are in a poor financial state
Why do people keep saying this? Despite the debt United is still one of the best run clubs on the planet, with the third highest rate of revenue. Unless you consider spending £50m on transfers a poor financial state.
2012: £50,000,000
2011: £52,900,000
2010: £27,200,000
2009: £21,000,000
2008: £35,750,000
2007: £61,750,000
Link for that?
And According to the Beeb you've got £423m debt, hence why shares were to be sold recently
I don't think thats a very well run club
If you want a well run club look at Arsenal. Sadly football now requires financial doping to guarantee victory
Equalled at United? Not necessarily, hold your horses with that one mate, especially as United are in a poor financial state
Why do people keep saying this? Despite the debt United is still one of the best run clubs on the planet, with the third highest rate of revenue. Unless you consider spending £50m on transfers a poor financial state.
2012: £50,000,000
2011: £52,900,000
2010: £27,200,000
2009: £21,000,000
2008: £35,750,000
2007: £61,750,000
Link for that?
And According to the Beeb you've got £423m debt, hence why shares were to be sold recently
I don't think thats a very well run club
If you want a well run club look at Arsenal. Sadly football now requires financial doping to guarantee victory
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/manchester-united-transfers.html
The club's debt stands at £423m (minus the cash reserve, so the debt itself is actually in the mid to high £300m). Floating it on the stock market is a bad idea especially in the current financial climate, but the main reason why they did it is to get a valuation of the club. I doubt they'd sell that few shares since the money they hoped to get from it was barely 15% of the debt. I wouldn't be surprised if they offered more shares to the public once the share prices have stabilized, and they eventually sell the club all together.
FUCK DREWBACCA | Dino Spumoni- "Mixing Supreme and Hollister is like having filet mignon with grape soda"
Equalled at United? Not necessarily, hold your horses with that one mate, especially as United are in a poor financial state
Why do people keep saying this? Despite the debt United is still one of the best run clubs on the planet, with the third highest rate of revenue. Unless you consider spending £50m on transfers a poor financial state.
2012: £50,000,000
2011: £52,900,000
2010: £27,200,000
2009: £21,000,000
2008: £35,750,000
2007: £61,750,000
Link for that?
And According to the Beeb you've got £423m debt, hence why shares were to be sold recently
I don't think thats a very well run club
If you want a well run club look at Arsenal. Sadly football now requires financial doping to guarantee victory
Viva Ronaldo!






FUCK DREWBACCA | Dino Spumoni- "Mixing Supreme and Hollister is like having filet mignon with grape soda"
Kayv: pull bitches, not triggers. throw parties, not fists. futurebass : my mom said life is like a box of kimchi. chopzz.tumblr.com
Oh yeah you feel my vibe right? Well bitch you killin it. Step back
FUCK DREWBACCA | Dino Spumoni- "Mixing Supreme and Hollister is like having filet mignon with grape soda"
Jenkison goes down and we have a free kick and the only players attacking it are Giroud and Walcott. smh wtf who the hell goes to any team in the prem and plays for a point.
Jenkison goes down and we have a free kick and the only players attacking it are Giroud and Walcott. smh wtf who the hell goes to any team in the prem and plays for a point.
Equalled at United? Not necessarily, hold your horses with that one mate, especially as United are in a poor financial state
Why do people keep saying this? Despite the debt United is still one of the best run clubs on the planet, with the third highest rate of revenue. Unless you consider spending £50m on transfers a poor financial state.
2012: £50,000,000
2011: £52,900,000
2010: £27,200,000
2009: £21,000,000
2008: £35,750,000
2007: £61,750,000
Link for that?
And According to the Beeb you've got £423m debt, hence why shares were to be sold recently
I don't think thats a very well run club
If you want a well run club look at Arsenal. Sadly football now requires financial doping to guarantee victory
If you actually care about United's finances read this http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/manchester-united-tuning-in-to-capital.html
Jenkison goes down and we have a free kick and the only players attacking it are Giroud and Walcott. smh wtf who the hell goes to any team in the prem and plays for a point.
Wtf
Loads of people play for a point
Giggs shouldn't start against any of the top 15 teams.
Anderson, Fletcher, and Cleverley played well in mid week, dropped all of them smh.
FUCK DREWBACCA | Dino Spumoni- "Mixing Supreme and Hollister is like having filet mignon with grape soda"
FUCK DREWBACCA | Dino Spumoni- "Mixing Supreme and Hollister is like having filet mignon with grape soda"
Kayv: pull bitches, not triggers. throw parties, not fists. futurebass : my mom said life is like a box of kimchi. chopzz.tumblr.com