Pacquiao v. Bradley - Page 3 | Hypebeast Forums

June 10, 2012 @ 09:49 PM

jaded

moderator

Post: 7501

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: ಠ______ಠ

http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Pacquiao+Bradley+fight+sparks+controversy+conspiracy+theories+what+they+saying+online/6759745/story.html

i'm the best mayne, i deed it

June 12, 2012 @ 06:19 AM

plddogs

Post: 40

Join Date: Oct 2009

Pacquiao is going to KO Bradley in rematch. Bank on it.

June 13, 2012 @ 03:53 AM

ToyotaGuy

Post: 1767

Join Date: May 2009

Location: Palmdale, CA

I wish Manny would still fight like this.
Manny used be to accurate,relax and really good.

June 13, 2012 @ 05:14 AM

tonysteak

Post: 1231

Join Date: Apr 2009

Location: stankonia

https://twitter.com/BusaBusss/status/212724162148569090

www.twitter.com/tonysteak

June 13, 2012 @ 06:23 PM

RubRub

Post: 207

Join Date: Dec 2011

Location: UC

Still surprised about the results, but do think there is something behind it... even though it was a clear win to Pacman...

Interested in AirMax

June 21, 2012 @ 03:07 AM

jaded

moderator

Post: 7501

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: ಠ______ಠ

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/8079349/wbo-review-timothy-bradley-manny-pacquiao-fight-unanimously-scores-pacquiao

The WBO completed its review Wednesday of Timothy Bradley's controversial split-decision victory against Manny Pacquiao with its five-member international judging panel all scoring the fight for Pacquiao, even though the official result will stand.

i'm the best mayne, i deed it

June 22, 2012 @ 09:20 AM

DeekO

Post: 783

Join Date: Jun 2007

Location: purgatario

Pacquiao is going to KO Bradley in rematch. Bank on it.

I am sure Bob Arum is will definitely bank on this, that nefarious skumbag!

June 22, 2012 @ 09:36 AM

DeekO

Post: 783

Join Date: Jun 2007

Location: purgatario

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/8079349/wbo-review-timothy-bradley-manny-pacquiao-fight-unanimously-scores-pacquiao

The WBO completed its review Wednesday of Timothy Bradley's controversial split-decision victory against Manny Pacquiao with its five-member international judging panel all scoring the fight for Pacquiao, even though the official result will stand.

Furthermore, it was obvious that Arum bought out the judges, pretty smart yet conniving on his part though..

Knowing that FMW would be serving his time, Arum decided to make as much money as possible by bribing the judges to give Bradley the decision, and get another fight or two out that mess.

Pretty harsh accusations, I know, but Arum has a history of bribery and who knows how many strings he can pull with a finger, especially in Vegas. I suspect he is behind this farce 100%

June 22, 2012 @ 03:22 PM

Zé Pequeno

Post: 612

Join Date: Feb 2010

That review is as useless as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow.

Cam'ron is my spiritual advisor

June 22, 2012 @ 03:24 PM

jaded

moderator

Post: 7501

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: ಠ______ಠ

I don't know, even with the international judges panel the scores covered the whole spectrum: 118-110, 117-111, 117-111, 116-112 and 115-113. It's obvious there is a major problem with how these fights are being scored. For one high ranking judge to see it as a 118-110 fight and another to see it 115-113 isn't exactly comforting, especially since Duane Ford and C.J. Ross both had Bradley winning 115-113 the night of the fight.

That review is as useless as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow.

The only thing to really come out of this is the WBO can now order a rematch even if Bradley and Pacquiao decided not to invoke the rematch clause in their contract.

i'm the best mayne, i deed it

June 23, 2012 @ 03:22 AM

ToyotaGuy

Post: 1767

Join Date: May 2009

Location: Palmdale, CA

i still want to see the rematch.

June 23, 2012 @ 03:46 AM

Whoadie

Post: 422

Join Date: Mar 2012

Location: SF

^rematch was already set before the fight, its on november i think

June 23, 2012 @ 04:39 AM

jaded

moderator

Post: 7501

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: ಠ______ಠ

The contract had a rematch clause with a date of November 10th I believe, but the fighters could've refused a rematch until the WBO stepped in, had five new judges watch the fight, and all 5 judges scored the fight for Pacquiao. Now, if Bradley and Pacquiao say they don't want to have a rematch, the WBO can order one to happen.

i'm the best mayne, i deed it

June 28, 2012 @ 10:27 PM

trolos714

Post: 472

Join Date: Apr 2012

Location: 714

^Espn says that Pac doesn't plan to exercise his rematch clause, and will most likely face Marquez a 4th time.

HB 325 PostHardcore/Metalcore/MelodicHardcore/Punk/PopPunk/ Skacore

June 28, 2012 @ 10:35 PM

jaded

moderator

Post: 7501

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: ಠ______ಠ

^Espn says that Pac doesn't plan to exercise his rematch clause, and will most likely face Marquez a 4th time.

Marquez's promoter put that out there, I don't know if it's true or not. Every article I've read says something different. As far as I know, no one from Pacquiao's camp has confirmed that or even stated anything like it. I know that the WBO can order a rematch between Pacquiao and Bradley now that they've reviewed the fight and scored it for Pacquiao, but I don't know if they will.

i'm the best mayne, i deed it

July 26, 2012 @ 08:06 PM