Puma Clyde VS Converse Chuck Taylor

Dec 23, 2006 @ 02:29
which would you rather cop:

Puma Clyde or Converse Chuck Taylor?

Inactive User

Dec 23, 2006 @ 02:34
Dependent on colourway, but most likely Puma Clydes. They're more durable, so if longevity is a priority, go with Clydes.
Dec 23, 2006 @ 10:34
Chucks are like 15 bucks, so I'll buy 3 pairs of those and then get a pair of Clydes to wear out cause they're much nicer looking.
Dec 23, 2006 @ 11:33
Chuck Taylor's just seem like the journey men's shoe in the sense that they go with everyything. They may not look the best but they seem to get the job done but i can't really picture Clydes looking bad unless they are some skinny ass pants
Dec 30, 2006 @ 16:50
im a puma guy but recently ive been trynna lean my style towars a more simple look, so i'd chose chucks plus my nickname is chuk, not clyde lol
Dec 30, 2006 @ 17:20
both are gd but for me i'm going for clydes now, got too many chucks already
Dec 31, 2006 @ 16:13
Clydes. Chucks haven't done me wrong..but there's just something odd when they're on my feet.
Dec 31, 2006 @ 17:30
chucks are ugly clydes are not
Dec 31, 2006 @ 21:22
clydes all the way
Dec 31, 2006 @ 23:13
going to get a pair soon...smokeyface
Jan 01, 2007 @ 21:57
Clydes, no doubt.
Please login first to reply.
HYPECHAT 0