Puma Clyde VS Converse Chuck Taylor

December 23, 2006 @ 02:29:37
which would you rather cop:

Puma Clyde or Converse Chuck Taylor?
December 23, 2006 @ 02:34:27

Inactive User

Dependent on colourway, but most likely Puma Clydes. They're more durable, so if longevity is a priority, go with Clydes.
December 23, 2006 @ 10:34:56
Chucks are like 15 bucks, so I'll buy 3 pairs of those and then get a pair of Clydes to wear out cause they're much nicer looking.
December 23, 2006 @ 11:33:14
Chuck Taylor's just seem like the journey men's shoe in the sense that they go with everyything. They may not look the best but they seem to get the job done but i can't really picture Clydes looking bad unless they are some skinny ass pants
December 30, 2006 @ 16:50:33
im a puma guy but recently ive been trynna lean my style towars a more simple look, so i'd chose chucks plus my nickname is chuk, not clyde lol
December 30, 2006 @ 17:20:36
both are gd but for me i'm going for clydes now, got too many chucks already
December 31, 2006 @ 16:13:14
Clydes. Chucks haven't done me wrong..but there's just something odd when they're on my feet.
December 31, 2006 @ 17:30:36
chucks are ugly clydes are not
December 31, 2006 @ 21:22:26
clydes all the way
December 31, 2006 @ 23:13:48
going to get a pair soon...smokeyface
January 01, 2007 @ 21:57:05
Clydes, no doubt.
Please login first to reply.