Post Hypebeast Picture at There Prime. VOL SAC BEEFIN

2012s want me to post pictures of thrifted Monsieur collection stuff, lol. $6 button downs are hardly a thing I need to prove ownership of. Monsieur collections are basic ass collections, most old af.

2012s want me to post pictures of thrifted Monsieur collection stuff, lol. $6 button downs are hardly a thing I need to prove ownership of. Monsieur collections are basic ass collections, most old af.

2011. and if its so easy to prove, why dont you do it? you're not cool cause you joined before me nigga. your ass is just life-less enough to stay active on a forum for 3 years talking about shit you will never own. and if its basic shit why are you trying to hype it and defend it like its the best fucking thing to ever be on earth.

wont dig in closet...will write essay

2012s want me to post pictures of thrifted Monsieur collection stuff, lol. $6 button downs are hardly a thing I need to prove ownership of. Monsieur collections are basic ass collections, most old af.

2011. and if its so easy to prove, why dont you do it? you're not cool cause you joined before me nigga. your ass is just life-less enough to stay active on a forum for 3 years talking about shit you will never own. and if its basic shit why are you trying to hype it and defend it like its the best fucking thing to ever be on earth.

When did I say that? It's basic as in simple. They are dress shirts, most often, you only see a collar when I wear them. I didn't hype them up to be 'the best'. However, for someone to think 'Ye brought Givenchy 'back' to the forefront is ridiculous. They never left, it's an old house, with a rich history. Why I on their 'dick'? I'm an Audrey Hepburn fan, have been for time, and Hepburn and Givenchy go hand-in-hand. It's easy enough to prove in the sense that I can dig up old photobucket accounts that host stuff I used to post here in p/u threads, but I care not to get a couple of s on some thrifted Givenchy, Dior or Lanvin, hence why I don't post p/u any longer. I'm not digging through my closet to pull out f/w clothing to take pictures to prove something to you, nor am I going to PB and recovering forgotten passwords to find pics of Monsieur.

You idolise 'Ye and his wearing of a dog t-shirt, and I choose Hepburn and more iconic Givenchy such as the wardrobe for Charade or Breakfast at Tiffany's, the stuff Count Hubert had a hand in. Do you.

If this is an L, I'll 'take' it.

2012s want me to post pictures of thrifted Monsieur collection stuff, lol. $6 button downs are hardly a thing I need to prove ownership of. Monsieur collections are basic ass collections, most old af.

2011. and if its so easy to prove, why dont you do it? you're not cool cause you joined before me nigga. your ass is just life-less enough to stay active on a forum for 3 years talking about shit you will never own. and if its basic shit why are you trying to hype it and defend it like its the best fucking thing to ever be on earth.

When did I say that? It's basic as in simple. They are dress shirts, most often, you only see a collar when I wear them. I didn't hype them up to be 'the best'. However, for someone to think 'Ye brought Givenchy 'back' to the forefront is ridiculous. They never left, it's an old house, with a rich history. Why I on their 'dick'? I'm an Audrey Hepburn fan, have been for time, and Hepburn and Givenchy go hand-in-hand. It's easy enough to prove in the sense that I can dig up old photobucket accounts that host stuff I used to post here in p/u threads, but I care not to get a couple of s on some thrifted Givenchy, Dior or Lanvin, hence why I don't post p/u any longer. I'm not digging through my closet to pull out f/w clothing to take pictures to prove something to you, nor am I going to PB and recovering forgotten passwords to find pics of Monsieur.

You idolise 'Ye and his wearing of a dog t-shirt, and I choose Hepburn and more iconic Givenchy such as the wardrobe for Charade or Breakfast at Tiffany's, the stuff Count Hubert had a hand in. Do you.

If this is an L, I'll 'take' it.

2012s want me to post pictures of thrifted Monsieur collection stuff, lol. $6 button downs are hardly a thing I need to prove ownership of. Monsieur collections are basic ass collections, most old af.

2011. and if its so easy to prove, why dont you do it? you're not cool cause you joined before me nigga. your ass is just life-less enough to stay active on a forum for 3 years talking about shit you will never own. and if its basic shit why are you trying to hype it and defend it like its the best fucking thing to ever be on earth.

When did I say that? It's basic as in simple. They are dress shirts, most often, you only see a collar when I wear them. I didn't hype them up to be 'the best'. However, for someone to think 'Ye brought Givenchy 'back' to the forefront is ridiculous. They never left, it's an old house, with a rich history. Why I on their 'dick'? I'm an Audrey Hepburn fan, have been for time, and Hepburn and Givenchy go hand-in-hand. It's easy enough to prove in the sense that I can dig up old photobucket accounts that host stuff I used to post here in p/u threads, but I care not to get a couple of s on some thrifted Givenchy, Dior or Lanvin, hence why I don't post p/u any longer. I'm not digging through my closet to pull out f/w clothing to take pictures to prove something to you, nor am I going to PB and recovering forgotten passwords to find pics of Monsieur.

You idolise 'Ye and his wearing of a dog t-shirt, and I choose Hepburn and more iconic Givenchy such as the wardrobe for Charade or Breakfast at Tiffany's, the stuff Count Hubert had a hand in. Do you.

If this is an L, I'll 'take' it.

You idolize how a female dresses nigga. You lowkey #SUSS. Btw, Ye did brought them to a mainstream level they'd never seen before come on b, let's keep it 3hunna.

Annoys me whenever I see pics like this.
Yes, I hate the word swag, but not everyone wears a fucking suit everywhere they go.