Underage drinking vs. Disorderly Conduct

November 19, 2013 @ 01:03:05 AM
Post: 526
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
My buddy just got busted last week for underage drinking and he doesn't know whether to take the underage, which is gone from your record at 21, or the disorderly, which sticks with you for 5 years. Both will end up costing about the same amount. 

His main concern is will he have to wait longer to get his license now bc of the underage? He's telling me that's the deciding factor but he's unsure of the answer.

Anyone here know what's up with it?

Fly on little wing

November 19, 2013 @ 01:18:00 AM
Post: 1705
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: L.A.
disorderly conduct because you could tell your future employer that you had a bad day or something. Rather than having the underage in your record making you look like a dumbass. Just my preference. 

"Hardship often prepare ordinary people for an extraordinary destiny" - C.S. Lewis

November 19, 2013 @ 03:40:19 AM
Post: 1704
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Peoria, IL
Underage drinking is dumb.
And how old is he that he doesn't have his license already?

November 19, 2013 @ 04:01:03 AM
Post: 3200
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario
You're in Canada? Where in Canada does an underage drinking ticket show up on a record? Even disorderly would be a fine and maybe a substance abuse seminar. Neither of those things can affect your chance for employment or your ability to obtain a licence. Neither even show up on a record check. 


This post is hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

Please login first to reply.