December 15, 2012 @ 01:19 AM
thatniggatho

Post: 76

Join Date: Dec 2012


its this, and also the fact its so easy to get a gun has engrained this murder mentallity into your people. I live in australia and if somebody gets shot it makes the news everytime cause its so uncommon. Like i said the only people who have guns in australia are top tier drug lords and underworld mafia figures and its the reason why our country is so safe.

The little thugs and wannabes that have popped up since 2pac got his first play on tv here would be busting guns at people by now if it wasnt for the fact that its literally impossible to get your hands on a gun unless your a top tier gangsta.
You're culture is different in australia and not nearly as diverse as America. You're confusing correlation with causation .. Furthermore, you are trying to step from specific to general which is a logical fallacy (you're dumb statement is false  and is not even a generality). The generality is that less than 8% of gun related crimes are committed by legal gun onwers in his country. So what.. you know of some thugs in America.. Congratulations.. I know of some in Australia and that wouldn't cause me to make some ignorant comment about the vast majority of sane people. 

THe biggest issue around the world and tragedies therein is : ignorance and stupidity... You're demonstrating some as you speak.
Your dumb dude, go read about australia. It is by far one of the most culturally diverse countries on the planet. Guns dont exist here, we live a peaceful life. Funny thing is if guns did exist i know these bogans would be killing but they cant get em and as a result, i can walk into any neighbourhood in this whole country and feel safe.
Dont need to read about it ..In case you missed it, I just pulled the same stunt you did (trollface).. Statistics don't lie as you said. But wait, there is something beyond statistics.. Opposed to what you're ignorant arse might think over in Australia .. The vast majority of Americans are safe just like you. I walk my drunk arse home from bars and nothing happens to me. I feel safe in my neighborhood too as do most Americans. We own a gun .. big whoop .. Last I recalled, people own knives.. That can kill people too .. What yall got, sporks in Australia? 


Sporks kill too dawg.. Log off B. No one wants to hear your ignorant comments.
December 15, 2012 @ 01:19 AM
CrackPipeLips

Post: 2010

Join Date: May 2011

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
December 15, 2012 @ 01:29 AM
nicedork

Post: 242

Join Date: Dec 2012

lol one of my australian friends has the EXACT same attitude as this guy towards guns. He has his panties in a massive bunch that I own firearms. I have tried to explain to him in a logical manner many times that guns =/= violence, that bad people + guns = violence.

He will never undestand because he is a stupid fucking australian and a descendant of a convict.
theirs bad people here to, they dont have guns though. im safe. have fun in your hole of a country though bruh
December 15, 2012 @ 01:30 AM
MrImFukNSleepN

Post: 2613

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: The City.

Guns gonna stay.

-insert deal with it gif-
December 15, 2012 @ 01:37 AM
BuddyOmar

Post: 2813

Join Date: Jun 2011

Location: #OYYOYVille

 




Gun laws. 
Yea, the gun got up and decided to go shoot people.

Yea but the person picked up a gun and killed 20+

People who say "gun laws dont need to be more stricter" are retarded. Seriously.

If dude tried this with a knife there would be a lot less deaths and injuries. 

Gun laws need to be tighter.
It would be impossible to clean up the streets of guns.
If someone wants a gun to commit a crime to this extent, they will find one, one way or the other.
Yes but they can make it significantly harder which would still reduce crime rate
The crime rate has nothing to do with guns being available or unavailable. The last time someone tried banning something with the intent of reducing crime it did the exact opposite and spawned one of the most violent eras of organized crime in American history.

This is a people problem not a gun problem. The reality is owning a gun is a tremendous responsibility and not everyone is fit to own one. There is a huge, huge market for illegal weapons so people looking for high-powered, high-fire rate weapons can get them if they want.

I agree with you about making it harder to buy a gun, but you're insinuating that reducing the amount of guns would reduce the amount of crime. It's tempting to make that correlation, but the issues that cause crime have nothing to do with the amount of people owning weapons. Look at a state like Wyoming. Over 67% of the state's population owns firearms and it happens to be one of the states with the least amount of violent crime.

That's a state where you see a lot of sportsman and hunters, sure, but if you can't see why the logic in your argument is flawed, I think the aforementioned example should clear things up.

I been saying this for so long, but we need to take guns away from civilians.

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT state that any civilian can carry fire arms


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Notice how it says a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not any fucking citizen.
You have to consider the time in which this was written. Back then firearms were slow-loaded, single shot weapons. The Founders didn't foresee there would be semi-automatic handguns with 15 round magazines, or high-powered assault rifles with a 30 round clip and high fire rate. 

The purpose of the 2nd amendment is so that citzens in this country can arm themselves in the event of a tyrannical takeover, and to ensure that the government is indeed fearful of its citzens. You also have to remember the context of their words. Back then, our Continental Army was made of plenty of civilians, so the idea is that in an emergency, the common man would have the ability to band together and protect the country if need be.

It also allowed for sportsman and regular citizens alike to arm their homesteads to defend against threats. 

You're also over looking a key part: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

WE the people are this proverbial militia. You, me, and everyone else are counted upon to safeguard the country in an emergency, and that's why it's important that upstanding, able-bodied and clear-thinking individuals should be allowed to legally own firearms.

Back when the Soviets invaded Finland, the first thing they tried to do was make every citizen in the country turn in their weapons as soon as they occupied the country. I am not some patriotic whackjob, but you have to understand the power that a weapon wields.

If you deny law-abiding citzens the right to defend themselves, you're instead arming a horde of criminals and violent sociopaths. These people WILL get guns no matter what, so making it harder on people like myself to defend ourselves is just illogical.

I own a firearm for the sole purpose of home defense, and regardless of how other's choose to misuse them, I do not think people like me should be subject to over-reactive punitive measures such as the ones you're suggesting. 

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBuddyOmar?feature=mhee |||||||||||||| Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/buddy_omar

December 15, 2012 @ 02:01 AM
thatniggatho

Post: 76

Join Date: Dec 2012



I been saying this for so long, but we need to take guns away from civilians.

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT state that any civilian can carry fire arms


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Notice how it says a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not any fucking citizen.
You have to consider the time in which this was written. Back then firearms were slow-loaded, single shot weapons. The Founders didn't foresee there would be semi-automatic handguns with 15 round magazines, or high-powered assault rifles with a 30 round clip and high fire rate. 

The purpose of the 2nd amendment is so that citzens in this country can arm themselves in the event of a tyrannical takeover, and to ensure that the government is indeed fearful of its citzens. You also have to remember the context of their words. Back then, our Continental Army was made of plenty of civilians, so the idea is that in an emergency, the common man would have the ability to band together and protect the country if need be.

It also allowed for sportsman and regular citizens alike to arm their homesteads to defend against threats. 

You're also over looking a key part: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

WE the people are this proverbial militia. You, me, and everyone else are counted upon to safeguard the country in an emergency, and that's why it's important that upstanding, able-bodied and clear-thinking individuals should be allowed to legally own firearms.

Back when the Soviets invaded Finland, the first thing they tried to do was make every citizen in the country turn in their weapons as soon as they occupied the country. I am not some patriotic whackjob, but you have to understand the power that a weapon wields.

If you deny law-abiding citzens the right to defend themselves, you're instead arming a horde of criminals and violent sociopaths. These people WILL get guns no matter what, so making it harder on people like myself to defend ourselves is just illogical.

I own a firearm for the sole purpose of home defense, and regardless of how other's choose to misuse them, I do not think people like me should be subject to over-reactive punitive measures such as the ones you're suggesting. 
Educate em Omar'. He seems to have missed a lesson in history class.. Or maybe its that he didn't extract true understanding from the information he can regurgitate.
December 15, 2012 @ 02:23 AM
nicedork

Post: 242

Join Date: Dec 2012

peace and love
December 15, 2012 @ 02:23 AM
yung swole

Post: 1245

Join Date: Jul 2010


machetes 2 ur chest

December 15, 2012 @ 02:25 AM
nicedork

Post: 242

Join Date: Dec 2012


its this, and also the fact its so easy to get a gun has engrained this murder mentallity into your people. I live in australia and if somebody gets shot it makes the news everytime cause its so uncommon. Like i said the only people who have guns in australia are top tier drug lords and underworld mafia figures and its the reason why our country is so safe.

The little thugs and wannabes that have popped up since 2pac got his first play on tv here would be busting guns at people by now if it wasnt for the fact that its literally impossible to get your hands on a gun unless your a top tier gangsta.
You're culture is different in australia and not nearly as diverse as America. You're confusing correlation with causation .. Furthermore, you are trying to step from specific to general which is a logical fallacy (you're dumb statement is false  and is not even a generality). The generality is that less than 8% of gun related crimes are committed by legal gun onwers in his country. So what.. you know of some thugs in America.. Congratulations.. I know of some in Australia and that wouldn't cause me to make some ignorant comment about the vast majority of sane people. 

THe biggest issue around the world and tragedies therein is : ignorance and stupidity... You're demonstrating some as you speak.
Your dumb dude, go read about australia. It is by far one of the most culturally diverse countries on the planet. Guns dont exist here, we live a peaceful life. Funny thing is if guns did exist i know these bogans would be killing but they cant get em and as a result, i can walk into any neighbourhood in this whole country and feel safe.
Dont need to read about it ..In case you missed it, I just pulled the same stunt you did (trollface).. Statistics don't lie as you said. But wait, there is something beyond statistics.. Opposed to what you're ignorant arse might think over in Australia .. The vast majority of Americans are safe just like you. I walk my drunk arse home from bars and nothing happens to me. I feel safe in my neighborhood too as do most Americans. We own a gun .. big whoop .. Last I recalled, people own knives.. That can kill people too .. What yall got, sporks in Australia? 


Sporks kill too dawg.. Log off B. No one wants to hear your ignorant comments.
keep denying it bruh. deep down i know you know its safer without guns, u just got a weak and frail frame so u cant defend yourself with out the heater anyway.

Come to australia bruh, ill knock u out with a thorn crown on my head

PEVCE VND LXVE
December 15, 2012 @ 02:26 AM
nicedork

Post: 242

Join Date: Dec 2012




cool guns, where your gains though




December 15, 2012 @ 02:40 AM
chief

Post: 3943

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: Location: Location:

Inb4someonechangestheirusernametoadamlanza

•••

December 15, 2012 @ 03:01 AM
++Phil

Post: 964

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: CA all day

https://soundcloud.com/drew-michael-2/episode-0-breathe


in regards to the shooting, interesting take 
December 15, 2012 @ 03:04 AM
bjornvan

Post: 445

Join Date: Sep 2012

its too late to make gun laws stricter in US. Yall keep comparing to other countries that have strict gun laws or dont allow citizens to carry, but when was the last time those countries allowed those citizens to carry guns or let citizens have easy access to guns ? Decades ago when was already hard to get. So its way easier to have control over that.. Not only that but even if dude didnt have guns he prob would have still killed those kids. If he made a bomb of some sort the death toll prob would be higher.
I think the best and quickest solution would be to up security in all high traffic public areas.Everything from schools and parks to sporting arenas and grocery stores. Like guns, it would be impossible to control and monitor sick people.
Stricter gun laws in US now wont even put a dent in shootings imo..Maybe if they had in the 70's or earlier it would have been better but now guns are everywhere and even with strict gun laws it wouldn't be too hard to get 1.
Dont get me wrong they should make the law more strict but I wouldn't expect to see any real difference
December 15, 2012 @ 03:10 AM
TASK

Post: 486

Join Date: Mar 2011


this is the guy
December 15, 2012 @ 03:20 AM
King Louis XIV

Post: 278

Join Date: Dec 2012



I been saying this for so long, but we need to take guns away from civilians.

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT state that any civilian can carry fire arms


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Notice how it says a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not any fucking citizen.
You have to consider the time in which this was written. Back then firearms were slow-loaded, single shot weapons. The Founders didn't foresee there would be semi-automatic handguns with 15 round magazines, or high-powered assault rifles with a 30 round clip and high fire rate. 

The purpose of the 2nd amendment is so that citzens in this country can arm themselves in the event of a tyrannical takeover, and to ensure that the government is indeed fearful of its citzens. You also have to remember the context of their words. Back then, our Continental Army was made of plenty of civilians, so the idea is that in an emergency, the common man would have the ability to band together and protect the country if need be.

It also allowed for sportsman and regular citizens alike to arm their homesteads to defend against threats. 

You're also over looking a key part: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

WE the people are this proverbial militia. You, me, and everyone else are counted upon to safeguard the country in an emergency, and that's why it's important that upstanding, able-bodied and clear-thinking individuals should be allowed to legally own firearms.

Back when the Soviets invaded Finland, the first thing they tried to do was make every citizen in the country turn in their weapons as soon as they occupied the country. I am not some patriotic whackjob, but you have to understand the power that a weapon wields.

If you deny law-abiding citzens the right to defend themselves, you're instead arming a horde of criminals and violent sociopaths. These people WILL get guns no matter what, so making it harder on people like myself to defend ourselves is just illogical.

I own a firearm for the sole purpose of home defense, and regardless of how other's choose to misuse them, I do not think people like me should be subject to over-reactive punitive measures such as the ones you're suggesting. 
Educate em Omar'. He seems to have missed a lesson in history class.. Or maybe its that he didn't extract true understanding from the information he can regurgitate.

I been reading the past couple posts and you really need to step down. I don't talk about things I know nothing about, neither should you.

Omar, you got some things right but you got a couple things wrong about his history. First thing, each state/colony had their own mini militia that were trained soldiers. It was these soldiers that formed the Continental Army along with a couple citizens-turned-soldiers.

Second, the Bill of Rights was really only created to persuade the states/Anti-Federalist to to agree to the formation of the United States and the Constitution. This means that the 2nd Amendment along with the rest of the Bill of Rights was really only created as a pulling factor. The right to bear arms was just a perk of being a part of the Union, basically. 

Third, there are many debates about the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. But here's the truth. When the constitution says "Well regulated militia" yes, they do mean the citizens... kinda. A militia was kinda what the Continental Army was. Militia =/= Any Citizen. A Militia is a body of Citizens enrolled for military service during state of emergency. Note the word "military."

Militia are different from professional soldiers, but they are not the same as citizens. A militia is organized, supported and led by a leader. This does not mean any citizen can go out, purchase a firearm, and say they are a part of a militia. Of course, the 2nd Amendment has been interpreted very loosely which is why these days, anyone can purchase a firearm.

Lastly, yea you are correct that the Founding Fathers didn't foresee the advancement of technology with machine guns, etc. Then don't you think that the 2nd Amendment should be taken more seriously? Now that firearms are even more deadly, I believe the government should really regulate gun laws.  

It is legal because I wish it.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:20 AM
King Louis XIV

Post: 278

Join Date: Dec 2012

Please fix hypebeast.

It is legal because I wish it.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:20 AM
King Louis XIV

Post: 278

Join Date: Dec 2012

double. Please fix hypebeast.

It is legal because I wish it.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:20 AM
King Louis XIV

Post: 278

Join Date: Dec 2012

Triple. Please fix hypebeast.

It is legal because I wish it.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:22 AM
Iggle

Post: 1131

Join Date: Nov 2007

its too late to make gun laws stricter in US. Yall keep comparing to other countries that have strict gun laws or dont allow citizens to carry, but when was the last time those countries allowed those citizens to carry guns or let citizens have easy access to guns ? Decades ago when was already hard to get. So its way easier to have control over that.. Not only that but even if dude didnt have guns he prob would have still killed those kids. If he made a bomb of some sort the death toll prob would be higher.
I think the best and quickest solution would be to up security in all high traffic public areas.Everything from schools and parks to sporting arenas and grocery stores. Like guns, it would be impossible to control and monitor sick people.
Stricter gun laws in US now wont even put a dent in shootings imo..Maybe if they had in the 70's or earlier it would have been better but now guns are everywhere and even with strict gun laws it wouldn't be too hard to get 1.
Dont get me wrong they should make the law more strict but I wouldn't expect to see any real difference
this is so fucking stupid. so what if there isn't an immediate impact? make changes now so future generations won't have to go through this. obviously that won't eliminate all gun violence, but if you make guns harder to obtain, there's going to be a decline in the violence. bombs can cause a lot more damage and death. you know why niggas like this don't go blowing up schools instead? cause it's pretty damn hard to go and buy a bomb.

and schools can barely afford to pay their own teachers. you got public schools cutting programs left and right. schools taking random days off cause they can't afford to pay their teachers. how you going to afford increasing security in every school? how you going to find enough cops to patrol every school?

#pedogangweindis

December 15, 2012 @ 03:34 AM
dinkleberg

Post: 340

Join Date: Aug 2012

im glad hb is actually having a conversation on a debatable issue, all trolling aside. nevertheless, these victims will always be remembered... bless em
December 15, 2012 @ 03:34 AM
snapper pow

Post: 21

Join Date: Dec 2010

its too late to make gun laws stricter in US. Yall keep comparing to other countries that have strict gun laws or dont allow citizens to carry, but when was the last time those countries allowed those citizens to carry guns or let citizens have easy access to guns ? Decades ago when was already hard to get. So its way easier to have control over that.. Not only that but even if dude didnt have guns he prob would have still killed those kids. If he made a bomb of some sort the death toll prob would be higher.
I think the best and quickest solution would be to up security in all high traffic public areas.Everything from schools and parks to sporting arenas and grocery stores. Like guns, it would be impossible to control and monitor sick people.
Stricter gun laws in US now wont even put a dent in shootings imo..Maybe if they had in the 70's or earlier it would have been better but now guns are everywhere and even with strict gun laws it wouldn't be too hard to get 1.
Dont get me wrong they should make the law more strict but I wouldn't expect to see any real difference
this is so fucking stupid. so what if there isn't an immediate impact? make changes now so future generations won't have to go through this. obviously that won't eliminate all gun violence, but if you make guns harder to obtain, there's going to be a decline in the violence. bombs can cause a lot more damage and death. you know why niggas like this don't go blowing up schools instead? cause it's pretty damn hard to go and buy a bomb.

and schools can barely afford to pay their own teachers. you got public schools cutting programs left and right. schools taking random days off cause they can't afford to pay their teachers. how you going to afford increasing security in every school? how you going to find enough cops to patrol every school?
nigga how hard is it to make a bomb these days?? columbine used pipe bombs n shit and converted a grill gas tank into a huge explosive, which luckily didn't blow up. just think of how much more info is out on the web since 1999 too... silk road n shit, denying citizen guns will do nothing, if you want them you can get them.

haven't you learned prohibition never works?? we should be more concerned about stopping the MOTIVE. ie the fame they get from the media, mental illness, etc.
December 15, 2012 @ 03:40 AM
TASK

Post: 486

Join Date: Mar 2011

its too late to make gun laws stricter in US. Yall keep comparing to other countries that have strict gun laws or dont allow citizens to carry, but when was the last time those countries allowed those citizens to carry guns or let citizens have easy access to guns ? Decades ago when was already hard to get. So its way easier to have control over that.. Not only that but even if dude didnt have guns he prob would have still killed those kids. If he made a bomb of some sort the death toll prob would be higher.
I think the best and quickest solution would be to up security in all high traffic public areas.Everything from schools and parks to sporting arenas and grocery stores. Like guns, it would be impossible to control and monitor sick people.
Stricter gun laws in US now wont even put a dent in shootings imo..Maybe if they had in the 70's or earlier it would have been better but now guns are everywhere and even with strict gun laws it wouldn't be too hard to get 1.
Dont get me wrong they should make the law more strict but I wouldn't expect to see any real difference
this is so fucking stupid. so what if there isn't an immediate impact? make changes now so future generations won't have to go through this. obviously that won't eliminate all gun violence, but if you make guns harder to obtain, there's going to be a decline in the violence. bombs can cause a lot more damage and death. you know why niggas like this don't go blowing up schools instead? cause it's pretty damn hard to go and buy a bomb.

and schools can barely afford to pay their own teachers. you got public schools cutting programs left and right. schools taking random days off cause they can't afford to pay their teachers. how you going to afford increasing security in every school? how you going to find enough cops to patrol every school?

-Chicago has some of the most strictest gun/weapon control
laws in the nation yet the crime rate has not fallen in the last 10
years.
December 15, 2012 @ 03:40 AM
dmwalking

moderator

Post: 2649

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: New England

I been saying this for so long, but we need to take guns away from civilians.

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT state that any civilian can carry fire arms


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Notice how it says a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not any fucking citizen.
Oh boy more idiots.  Yes, since a well regulated militia is necessary to protect our freedoms our right to have guns should never be infringed.. Prior to the revolutionary war, were there militias? No. Had they no had guns, coul they have successfully revolted? No. So the law is to ensure our right to bear arms is never infringed in the event that we might have to form well regulated militias to defend our freedoms. 

You're welcome.

guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:41 AM
dmwalking

moderator

Post: 2649

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: New England

I been saying this for so long, but we need to take guns away from civilians.

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT state that any civilian can carry fire arms


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Notice how it says a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not any fucking citizen.
Oh boy more idiots.  Yes, since a well regulated militia is necessary to protect our freedoms our right to have guns should never be infringed.. Prior to the revolutionary war, were there militias? No. Had they no had guns, coul they have successfully revolted? No. So the law is to ensure our right to bear arms is never infringed in the event that we might have to form well regulated militias to defend our freedoms. 

You're welcome.

guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:44 AM
Beach2theBay

Post: 3039

Join Date: Apr 2009

Location: Long Beach,CA

I'm watching a stream of Power 106 FM's concert and Cash Out said "lets have a moment of silence for the people in Connecticut one time." After that the dj starting playing Cash Out and the first lyric is "I'm ridin 'round with that nina." Awesome.
December 15, 2012 @ 03:45 AM
dmwalking

moderator

Post: 2649

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: New England

Gun laws. 
Yea, the gun got up and decided to go shoot people.

Yea but the person picked up a gun and killed 20+

People who say "gun laws dont need to be more stricter" are retarded. Seriously.

If dude tried this with a knife there would be a lot less deaths and injuries. 

Gun laws need to be tighter.
Gun laws should be tighter in preventing them from getting into the wrong hands, sure. But the gun is not the culprit. The person is. He could've used poison. A bow and arrow. A home made suicide bomb. A lot of things. Killers will find things to kill with. Can't blame guns. 

guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.

December 15, 2012 @ 03:51 AM
dmwalking

moderator

Post: 2649

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: New England

Too much to respond to. Smh. Connecticut has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation and this still happened. This isn't about guns or race. It's about mental health. 

Americans are getting crazier and we should be asking why. We shouldn't be so shortsighted and blame guns. All that will happen is guys will start doing Oklahoma bombings instead. Killers will kill. Can't just go around anything with deadly potential.

guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.

December 15, 2012 @ 04:03 AM
thatniggatho

Post: 76

Join Date: Dec 2012



And so it begins.
December 15, 2012 @ 04:10 AM
TASK

Post: 486

Join Date: Mar 2011

"authorities recovered two 9mm handguns from the scene: one a Glock and the other a SIG Sauer.[2][11] A .223 caliber rifle manufactured by Bushmaster Firearms International was found in the back of a car in the parking lot, but was not used at the school.[2] The guns were owned by and legally registered to the suspect's mother.[12]
Neither handgun would have been legal for the gunman to obtain, or
possess in Connecticut at the time of the incident, as he was under
21 years of age"
December 15, 2012 @ 04:15 AM
It's Only Hype

Post: 4070

Join Date: Jan 2008

lol one of my australian friends has the EXACT same attitude as this guy towards guns. He has his panties in a massive bunch that I own firearms. I have tried to explain to him in a logical manner many times that guns =/= violence, that bad people + guns = violence.

He will never undestand because he is a stupid fucking australian and a descendant of a convict.
theirs bad people here to, they dont have guns though. im safe. have fun in your hole of a country though bruh

but guns aren't banned in Australia .. ?? Am I wrong?

Please login first to reply.
Back To Top