Here comes this nigga trainer red w/ the irrelevant history babble... Trying to demonstrate to us all his mastery in knowing shit that once was. Listen, let me drop some knowledge on your still in school ass. History.. The present and future are nothing more than manifestations of Human Psychology....
You're really gonna try not debate this with me?
You must be one stupid little fuck who thinks they know something cause they learned it from a high school textbook. All your statements are wrong.
1. No. They were NOT citizens. They were soldiers. They were trained to be a part of the Union army. Wanna know something else? After the war, they were war veterans who got PAID for their military service.
2. No. They did not use guerilla tactics. They were led by Washington. Washington was a officer in the Virginia Army AND he fought under the British in the French-Indian war you dumbass. Washington had war experience. He knew the rules of war.
3. Again you're wrong. The Union soldiers did have uniforms. Yes, in the beginning they didnt, but they eventually did rather quickly.
These look like uniforms to me!
4. Oh we got a smartass in here. When I said Union I didn't mean the Union Army from the Civil War. Obviously I meant the federal army. Union = Federal. But if you wanna be a smartass about it, then the Continental army.
Step your high school history knowledge down, dumb ass.
A+B = C
History : Back in 1920, some nigga added A and B and it equaled C.
That shits irrelevant. It's 2012 and in this country we have the right to bear arms. Guns are not what are the root cause of this tragedy. In china a nigga just stabbed 20 kids to death today. WTF should we confiscate knives dawg? Wtf does history have to do w/ any of this shit. Niggas in America are stupid in the head thus why shit like this pops off a lot. The data shows this. I don't need some whack ass in journey in history to dissect some of the root reasons for today's tragedy. Todays tragedy can be explained by shit that's relevant in todays day and time. Fuck we gotta go back 100-200 years to understand today for?
Dumb ass niggas in school always think they're mr.Know-it-alls. Nigga graduate and step your monkey ass out into the real world.
lmfao at this dumbass coming back with his psychology arguments. i guess you didnt understand the first time i ethered yo ass.
the point im making is that the 2nd amendment doesn't say that any person can carry firearms.
it says "a well regulated militia."
do you understand my point? Whether times are different now or not, the Constitution is the Constitution.
Maybe the Supreme Court or whatever needs to update it but until then, i dont believe any civilian should have he right to bear arms.
For Immediate Release: 12/11/2012BELLEVUE, WA â The Second Amendment Foundation has won a huge victory for the right to bear arms outside the home, with a ruling in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that declares the right to self-defense is âbroader than the right to have a gun in oneâs home.âThe case of Moore v. Madigan, with Judge Richard Posner writing for the majority, gives the Illinois legislature 180 days to "craft a new gun law that will impose reasonable limitations, consistent with the public safety and the Second Amendmentâ¦on the carrying of guns in public.ââWe are very happy with Judge Posnerâs majority opinion,â said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. âThis is a victory for Illinois citizens who have been long denied a right recognized in the other 49 states; to have the means necessary for self-defense outside the home.âIn the broader sense,â he added, âthis ruling affirms that the right to keep and bear arms, itself, extends beyond the boundary of oneâs front door. This is a huge victory for the Second Amendment.ââThe Second Amendment,â Judge Posner writes, âstates in its entirety that âa well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.â The right to âbearâ as distinct from the right to âkeepâ arms is unlikely to refer to the home. To speak of âbearingâ arms within oneâs home would at all times have been an awkward usage. A right to bear arms thus implies a right to carry a loaded gun outside the home."Later, Judge Posner adds, âTo confine the right to be armed to the home is to divorce the Second Amendment from the right of self-defense described in Heller and McDonald.ââThat the court will give Illinois lawmakers six months to craft a law allowing carry outside the home recognizes that the right to bear arms means what it says,â Gottlieb concluded. âThe ball is now in the Legislatureâs court, and we eagerly wait to see how well they can live up to their responsibility.âThe Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org
) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. In addition to the landmark McDonald v. Chicago
Supreme Court Case, SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; New Orleans; Chicago and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers and numerous amicus briefs holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.