i assume OP is black? what is the race of the bitch?lulz so fucking true
if she's asian - it's understandable i guess. asian parents won't accept a black dude anyways.
if she's white - lol like u had a chance.
if she's latina - you're fucking up.
if she's black - lol asian dudes don't go for black girls.
guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.
wrong^^^^lol @ this guy. Did Tyrone take your girl or something?
i wouldnt give a shit who pleasured a girl better than me
i just dont like chicks who date black guys,
black dudes should stick with black chicks and other races sluts
ex: i dont watch porn if a black guys in it
and i would not want my sister to date a black guy
im not racist
i got a ton of black friends
just dont like women who like black guys
@jesus and iss never game me an l
they just repeated i took ls when no ls were taken which is all that wack flamethrower does
They aint taken over shit. There's just more of them. Say the odds are that 30/100 niggas will be successful.i live in greater vancouver, a region with 2 million people. around 40% of our population is asian. i have to deal with rude ass chinese people who couldnt be bothered to even learn English every day of my life. even worse the punk 20 year old kids form hong kong flaunting mommy and daddys money all day. if any of yall lived here you would begin to hate them as well.bruh i liv in toronto. i kno bout dem asians. thats no reason to hate em jus cuz theyre takin over the world loll.
jus enjoy being free while it lasts cuz in about 20 yrs they gon enslave all our asses.
My garbage can eats better than 99% of the world.
Blog : lifetimesofmrm.blogspot.com Check my tumblr lifetimesofmrm.tumblr.com HELGEN X. I love the fact that you don't dress like a fake poser skateboarding faggot from HB!
And Asians comprise how much of the U.S population?wrong^^^^lol @ this guy. Did Tyrone take your girl or something?
i wouldnt give a shit who pleasured a girl better than me
i just dont like chicks who date black guys,
black dudes should stick with black chicks and other races sluts
ex: i dont watch porn if a black guys in it
and i would not want my sister to date a black guy
im not racist
i got a ton of black friends
just dont like women who like black guys
@jesus and iss never game me an l
they just repeated i took ls when no ls were taken which is all that wack flamethrower doesThey aint taken over shit. There's just more of them. Say the odds are that 30/100 niggas will be successful.i live in greater vancouver, a region with 2 million people. around 40% of our population is asian. i have to deal with rude ass chinese people who couldnt be bothered to even learn English every day of my life. even worse the punk 20 year old kids form hong kong flaunting mommy and daddys money all day. if any of yall lived here you would begin to hate them as well.bruh i liv in toronto. i kno bout dem asians. thats no reason to hate em jus cuz theyre takin over the world loll.
jus enjoy being free while it lasts cuz in about 20 yrs they gon enslave all our asses.
Asians got 1000 niggas so 30/100*1000 = 300 successful niggas
Blacks got 100 .. so 30/100*100 = 30 Successful ...
It's not that they are more successful .. it's just more of them out there so the outcome factoring the odds results in more quantity. Take a trip over to mainland china and see how the majority of em live. Shit makes the projects look like paradise
Asians have the highest median income in the US so I'd say yea, they're successful. The fact that there's more Asians than niggas don't really matter since median is not sensitive to that.
Also, you picked some random pic out of the country. Every nation in the world will have farmers and extremely poor areas. The bigger cities in China aren't that different from the big cities in the US. They actually have to pay more for luxuries like cars than we do. I know that for the price of buying a Porsche in China, you can get at least 2 of them here in the US.
Lastly, in response to the dude saying they're taking over the world, I'm certain that the US is limited on its reign as the world's strongest nation. We'll probably lose that status by 2030, but the thing is, there's not going to be another single nation replacing the US as the strongest. It will probably be more alliances of nations.
nlsnl.tumblr.com
Asians started coming a lot since 1960s from my knowledge.A Small %'age.And Asians comprise how much of the U.S population?
And the ones that have high incomes immigrated here when in largest numbers?
Recently under H1b-visas (highly skilled workers) .. Thus skewing median income figure. So nah, they're not taking over and numbers do matter as it impacts how many of them you have to choose from when selecting highly skilled immigrants.
So my example does matter.
I picked that picture because beyond the main cities that's how the majority live still. The reason why you have the ultra rich in china, for example, is because of how much they exploit the large number of people in the underclass. So nah', the majority of people in Asian countries aren't ballin' and the ones that are is due to exploiting the larger number of poor people... The story of life.
And I agree that it will be an alliance. Economic prosperity is spreading around the world. It's not that anyone is taking over. It's that previously broke arse niggas the world over are finally getting their hands on prosperity. As such, countries with larger numbers will have a larger presence around the world and more prosperous people.
So, let me break it down for you bruh.
Group A : Pick the top 1,000 people out of 10,000
Group B : Pick the top 100 people out of 100,000
Doesn't take rocket science to understand you'll likely have a better sampling of top people in Group B. Thus, when you do a median income of them vs. Group A, you are likely to have higher median income levels. Try digging behind the numbers more to achieve true understanding. When you start talking about prosperity of a race, you can't just sit back and ignore the people still living in huts as if they don't exist. That's selective sampling and its dishonest.
how do you explain the fact that asians have quickly become successful in america while other minorities have struggled to reach that same level of success? it can't be just percentages. how come people in other countries and markets do not achieve the same level of success? the fact that asia is on the rise is irrefutable, and if you deny that you're just fooling yourselfSimple. Most Asians come here under their own free-will to pursue a better life. With them came their culture/language/community. For instance, if you really want to dig into the 'facts' and you step beyond that mainstream 'model minority' falsehood, you'd see that Africans.. Yes, people from Africa .. Who migrate here under their own free will have the highest degree of educational attainment (above Asians). Yes, it's amazing what 500 years of slavery which systematically wipes out language/culture/community for a people can do. Further, you must realize civil rights just passed in the 70s. My dad was a teenager through that. You can't expect people to obtain similar heights when on unequal footing. Why don't people in other markets achieve the same succcess? Where you been breh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRIC
Indeed, I know the history of Asian immigration. It's important to note what prosperity was back then vs. now and when talking about figures like present day median income, what is the face of Asian immigration today.Asians started coming a lot since 1960s from my knowledge.A Small %'age.And Asians comprise how much of the U.S population?
And the ones that have high incomes immigrated here when in largest numbers?
Recently under H1b-visas (highly skilled workers) .. Thus skewing median income figure. So nah, they're not taking over and numbers do matter as it impacts how many of them you have to choose from when selecting highly skilled immigrants.
So my example does matter.
I picked that picture because beyond the main cities that's how the majority live still. The reason why you have the ultra rich in china, for example, is because of how much they exploit the large number of people in the underclass. So nah', the majority of people in Asian countries aren't ballin' and the ones that are is due to exploiting the larger number of poor people... The story of life.
And I agree that it will be an alliance. Economic prosperity is spreading around the world. It's not that anyone is taking over. It's that previously broke arse niggas the world over are finally getting their hands on prosperity. As such, countries with larger numbers will have a larger presence around the world and more prosperous people.
So, let me break it down for you bruh.
Group A : Pick the top 1,000 people out of 10,000
Group B : Pick the top 100 people out of 100,000
Doesn't take rocket science to understand you'll likely have a better sampling of top people in Group B. Thus, when you do a median income of them vs. Group A, you are likely to have higher median income levels. Try digging behind the numbers more to achieve true understanding. When you start talking about prosperity of a race, you can't just sit back and ignore the people still living in huts as if they don't exist. That's selective sampling and its dishonest.
I'm not sure how recent you meant by recently but all the Asian friends I have don't have high skilled working parents. They're parents basically did something like open own restaurant, or do some entry job and move up slowly in the ranks and most are living a bit above middle class income range.
Your statement about the rich exploiting the poor applies to the US as well. There's no doubt that standard of living is higher in the states but most of the US population aren't that well off
Also regarding your group A/B thing, aren't there more niggas than Asians in the US? So by your logic the niggas should be doing better
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBuddyOmar?feature=mhee |||||||||||||| Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/buddy_omar
Indeed, I know the history of Asian immigration. It's important to note what prosperity was back then vs. now and when talking about figures like present day median income, what is the face of Asian immigration today.Asians started coming a lot since 1960s from my knowledge.A Small %'age.And Asians comprise how much of the U.S population?
And the ones that have high incomes immigrated here when in largest numbers?
Recently under H1b-visas (highly skilled workers) .. Thus skewing median income figure. So nah, they're not taking over and numbers do matter as it impacts how many of them you have to choose from when selecting highly skilled immigrants.
So my example does matter.
I picked that picture because beyond the main cities that's how the majority live still. The reason why you have the ultra rich in china, for example, is because of how much they exploit the large number of people in the underclass. So nah', the majority of people in Asian countries aren't ballin' and the ones that are is due to exploiting the larger number of poor people... The story of life.
And I agree that it will be an alliance. Economic prosperity is spreading around the world. It's not that anyone is taking over. It's that previously broke arse niggas the world over are finally getting their hands on prosperity. As such, countries with larger numbers will have a larger presence around the world and more prosperous people.
So, let me break it down for you bruh.
Group A : Pick the top 1,000 people out of 10,000
Group B : Pick the top 100 people out of 100,000
Doesn't take rocket science to understand you'll likely have a better sampling of top people in Group B. Thus, when you do a median income of them vs. Group A, you are likely to have higher median income levels. Try digging behind the numbers more to achieve true understanding. When you start talking about prosperity of a race, you can't just sit back and ignore the people still living in huts as if they don't exist. That's selective sampling and its dishonest.
I'm not sure how recent you meant by recently but all the Asian friends I have don't have high skilled working parents. They're parents basically did something like open own restaurant, or do some entry job and move up slowly in the ranks and most are living a bit above middle class income range.
Your statement about the rich exploiting the poor applies to the US as well. There's no doubt that standard of living is higher in the states but most of the US population aren't that well off
Also regarding your group A/B thing, aren't there more niggas than Asians in the US? So by your logic the niggas should be doing better
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
And nah niggas shouldn't be doing better than Asians .. You are missing all sorts of details.
The face of Asian immigration today is shaped by H1b visas. <- these people are factored into the median income metric.Asians immigrated here under different conditions/treatment than other minorities.
The majority of today's African Americans came on slave ships and were enslaved for over 500 years .. Their culture/language/community was systematically destroyed. Niggas were just given civil rights back in the 70s. My father for instance was a teenager then. Such systematic damage takes (psychologically proven) 3-4 generations to be erased. that's 90-120 years from the 70s.. that's 2060-2090. So nah, having started the race at different points, you shouldn't expect them to be doing better than Asians.
Now, if you want to compare African immigrants of today to Asians Immigrants .. that's a more fair comparison .. Surprise .. there isn't much of a difference.. Amazing what happens when you come to a place under your own free will w/ your culture/language/community preserved ...
African immigrants to the U.S. are among the most educated groups in the United States. Some 48.9 percent of all African immigrants hold a college diploma. This is more than double the rate of native-born white Americans, and nearly four times the rate of native-born African Americans.[12] According to the 2000 Census, the rate of college diploma acquisition is highest among Egyptian Americans at 59.7 percent, followed closely by Nigerian Americans at 58.6 percent.[13][14]In 1997, 19.4 percent of all adult African immigrants in the United States held a graduate degree, compared to 8.1 percent of adult white Americans and 3.8 percent of adult black Americans in the United States, respectively.[15] According to the 2000 Census, the percentage of Africans with a graduate degree is highest among Nigerian Americans at 28.3 percent, followed by Egyptian Americans at 23.8 percent.[13][14]Of the African-born population in the United States age 25 and older, 87.9% reported having a high school degree or higher,[16] compared with 78.8% of Asian-born immigrants and 76.8% of European-born immigrants, respectively.[17]
......
Forum Administrator • @HOYITSDREW
.
Not your average Namekian - Piccolo
You a history major in what? basket weaving? Try taking some courses in psychology... and nah, that wasn't my major.. That's something you minor in cause it's weak.umm history major and im gonna point these things out.
1. both of you little girls got your history wrong when it comes to immigration and slaves from the past.
2. You got your information from wiki. C'mon brah.
3. Asians have scored the highest in most of international tests.
4. The most important thing. You are not taking the consideration of culture. yes, many African-Americans lost their native culture but that does not mean anything for many reasons. First, Africans before colonization were just not educated. They were so far behind with their time that its crazy. Asia on the other hand (China to be specific) was neck to neck with European countries. Europe didnt pass Asia in economically and technologically until around the 1800s. The only thing that gave europe the jump was the industrial revolution which started in great britain only because they were naturally given the factors to start it.
Asia's economy only grew. The only hit they taken was during the IMF era in the late 1900s.
im too lazy to talk about culture but to break it down, Africans did not have a culture for striving for education. They rarely even had philosophers. So if African Americans did live by their culture from their native land, they would've jumped 500 years back. Yes, slavery was inhumane. Yes, colored people were treated horribly (And by colored, I mean all races). But your argument about psychological effect of future generation for Africans is honestly invalid.
john lamone is a fag. boland is a fag.
this thread is in the 4th page and now niggas bringing out maps and shit. conclusion: asians stole your bitches.Hardly. Just trying to educate these frailsians ... Every race on the planet steals their bishes and thus their salty arses stay trying to cling to some .. we are superior/more educated. I'm trying to help em catch an L on dat' too.
You a history major in what? basket weaving? Try taking some courses in psychology... and nah, that wasn't my major.. That's something you minor in cause it's weak.umm history major and im gonna point these things out.
1. both of you little girls got your history wrong when it comes to immigration and slaves from the past.
2. You got your information from wiki. C'mon brah.
3. Asians have scored the highest in most of international tests.
4. The most important thing. You are not taking the consideration of culture. yes, many African-Americans lost their native culture but that does not mean anything for many reasons. First, Africans before colonization were just not educated. They were so far behind with their time that its crazy. Asia on the other hand (China to be specific) was neck to neck with European countries. Europe didnt pass Asia in economically and technologically until around the 1800s. The only thing that gave europe the jump was the industrial revolution which started in great britain only because they were naturally given the factors to start it.
Asia's economy only grew. The only hit they taken was during the IMF era in the late 1900s.
im too lazy to talk about culture but to break it down, Africans did not have a culture for striving for education. They rarely even had philosophers. So if African Americans did live by their culture from their native land, they would've jumped 500 years back. Yes, slavery was inhumane. Yes, colored people were treated horribly (And by colored, I mean all races). But your argument about psychological effect of future generation for Africans is honestly invalid.
1.) I didn't. Can't speak for other guy and you haven't said sh*t to disprove it.
2.) Wikipedia is the largest body of peer reviewed/verified information in 2012. What nigga you still using your grandma's Encyclopedia Britannica that is missin' 4 alphabets?
3.) What exactly does that mean? I work around people who scored high on tests all day and they can't put larger concepts together... Non point.
4.) Yes, lets get to actual historical information... Before you go rambling on and on about colonization and Asians this and that.. Lets get things straight on Africans.. One of the most powerful/culture/educated civilizations in History .. The Egyptians were Africans (proven) and much of the colonial Europeans owe their advancement to them.
Genetic migrations from Sub Saharan East African into Egypt and across Northern across correlate with the origins and spread of the Afro-Asiactic languages
Analysis of crania is the traditional approach to assessing ancient population origins, relationships, and diversity. In studies based on anatomical traits and measurements of crania, similarities have been found between Nile Valley crania from 30,000, 20,000 and 12,000 years ago and various African remains from more recent times (see Thoma 1984; Brauer and Rimbach 1990; Angel and Kelley 1986; Keita 1993). Studies of crania from southern predynastic Egypt, from the formative period (4000-3100 B.C.), show them usually to be more similar to the crania of ancient Nubians, Ku(*)(*)(*)(*)es, Saharans, or modern groups from the Horn of Africa than to those of dynastic northern Egyptians or ancient or modern southern Europeans."
(S. O. Y and A.J. Boyce, "The Geographical Origins and Population Relationships of Early Ancient Egyptians", in Egypt in Africa, Theodore Celenko (ed), Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 20-33)
I'm not even going to dig into this shit any further because the unlinking of Africans to Egypt has been the biggest piece of horseshit European historians have tried to pull throughout history to try to discredit Africans.
Remember this quote 'He who writes history controls the world'. You continue studying history and I'll continue making it. Salty fools stay trying to put down Africans any chance they can get.
......
.
