If it's natural, gays have to admit that they're genetic rejects. If they believe in evolution and Darwinian theory, then they have to admit that they are genetic trash. If only the best genes make it to the next generation, then any gay person must admit that nature made them rejects. I suppose artificial insemination and surrogate mothers come into play, but then you run the risk of passing on more reject genes and defeating the purpose of nature's own attempt at population control. If you don't believe it's natural, then it's simply a choice. I know mad gays always say, oh when did you choose to be straight? I'd say when I was about 5 years old and I accidentally saw some titties on cinemax late night.....and I chose to love titties for the rest of my life. But I digress. I believe in nurture over nature when it comes to sexuality. But in the end it shouldn't make a big difference in how you treat people.
damn DM ur usually one of the wisest dude on HB but u sound real ignorant w/ dis one
not genetics =/= equals choice. how ur brain reacts and transforms itself duznt necessarily come from a conscious decision. nurture could mean childhood sexual abuse, society itself, upbringing, shit maybe even porn these days.
and GTFO w/ that evolution shit. in todays modern society, survival of the fittest as Darwinian meant it is a non-factor. tf is a "bad gene" when virtually anyone can live on regardless in the technological world we live in today. nature duznt control jack shit right now, and if it did theres a lot of str8 ppls genes that would be more detrimental to them then "the gay gene" homosexuals have.