FS: Supreme Tortoise Factory - $150
Remain? Did you mean remind? LMAO and you bolded it? You must be doing this on purpose man. No way you could be this dumb.
Let me remain you B that this country wasn't founded by faggots. Our founding fathers are rolling over the grave with states allowing homosexuals to get married.
Marriage is between a nikka and a bitch.
guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.
pretty sure that was what he intended.
Remain? Did you mean remind? LMAO and you bolded it? You must be doing this on purpose man. No way you could be this dumb.
I used to think is wasnt natural (not trying to stereotype) but many gay guys have that distinct high pitched voice. they have to be born with that correct?ur a fucking idiot hahahahaha
guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.
Let me remain you B that this country wasn't founded by faggots. Our founding fathers are rolling over the grave with states allowing homosexuals to get married.Marriage is between a nikka and a bitch.dead @ "let me remain you"
If it's natural, gays have to admit that they're genetic rejects. If they believe in evolution and Darwinian theory, then they have to admit that they are genetic trash. If only the best genes make it to the next generation, then any gay person must admit that nature made them rejects. I suppose artificial insemination and surrogate mothers come into play, but then you run the risk of passing on more reject genes and defeating the purpose of nature's own attempt at population control. If you don't believe it's natural, then it's simply a choice. I know mad gays always say, oh when did you choose to be straight? I'd say when I was about 5 years old and I accidentally saw some titties on cinemax late night.....and I chose to love titties for the rest of my life. But I digress. I believe in nurture over nature when it comes to sexuality. But in the end it shouldn't make a big difference in how you treat people.damn DM ur usually one of the wisest dude on HB but u sound real ignorant w/ dis one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7T9gicSnR05:15 remain me of what u said.
edit: god drew hired some shit head design crew.
You can even see the <p> </p> html tags
These nikkas designed this forum on expression web
Last.fm - DStyles23 Xbox Live GT: DStyles23
It's ironic that you're saying I sound ignorant after typing that way. I'm not above admitting that I might be ignorant on the subject as far as new info goes, but based on what I know, it makes sense. Darwinian theory says nature intended for the best genes to survive. So a genetic disposition toward homosexuality would lead me to believe that a person is genetically inferior since they have no natural instinct to procreate. That sounds more like logic than ignorance. I never said the gay gene was detrimental. I said that gays using surrogate mothers and artificial insemination to reproduce means they're spreading their genes. Some people said that being gay is nature's population control. But the methods I mentioned would be counterproductive.
damn DM ur usually one of the wisest dude on HB but u sound real ignorant w/ dis one
not genetics =/= equals choice. how ur brain reacts and transforms itself duznt necessarily come from a conscious decision. nurture could mean childhood sexual abuse, society itself, upbringing, shit maybe even porn these days.
and GTFO w/ that evolution shit. in todays modern society, survival of the fittest as Darwinian meant it is a non-factor. tf is a "bad gene" when virtually anyone can live on regardless in the technological world we live in today. nature duznt control jack shit right now, and if it did theres a lot of str8 ppls genes that would be more detrimental to them then "the gay gene" homosexuals have.
guy on some broke bus. Love, Sosa. "Don't feed the trolls" initiative coming soon. We can rebuild.
It's ironic that you're saying I sound ignorant after typing that way. I'm not above admitting that I might be ignorant on the subject as far as new info goes, but based on what I know, it makes sense. Darwinian theory says nature intended for the best genes to survive. So a genetic disposition toward homosexuality would lead me to believe that a person is genetically inferior since they have no natural instinct to procreate. That sounds more like logic than ignorance. I never said the gay gene was detrimental. I said that gays using surrogate mothers and artificial insemination to reproduce means they're spreading their genes. Some people said that being gay is nature's population control. But the methods I mentioned would be counterproductive. Like I said, I believe that sexuality is determined by more by choice. I don't believe you're born one way or the other. I believe that as you grow up you experience feelings that influence your choices once you start to have sexual desires.First of all bruh maybe u dindt meant it like that but when you emply the word "choice" u make it seem like homosexuality is swtich that they can just turn on and off. When in fact, whether u believe in nurture or nature, its not.
Last.fm - DStyles23 Xbox Live GT: DStyles23
Last.fm - DStyles23 Xbox Live GT: DStyles23
FS: Supreme Tortoise Factory - $150