You're probably not going to read this long ass post but Brooklyn, I just can't let that shit go.
Exactly...Dudes don't think outside of the box...
You're not supposed to think outside of the box with the Law. The whole point of the Law is that (ideally) it's objective. You really think creative
sentencing is a laudable idea? "Yeah, she murdered five people but I mean, she is
a woman who probably has emotional problems and shit so hey she's free to go!"
I can guarantee 90 percent or more of the cases of adult women on younger boys are with consent by both parties... The kid OK'ed it..
You are very misguided not to believe there are massive numbers of girls out there who would/do consent to these things. But more importantly: no, you can't 'guarantee' anything. Consent is obviously something to be determined on a case to case basis. Are we just supposed to assume that every male teacher case is rape while every female teacher had consent? Sure, let's just change the Law based on another poorly grounded sexual assumption!
IDC what anyone says I feel young girls would resist much quicker than a young boy, but they are probably easier to mislead.. Not only that a 12 yr old girl would be scared to report it to someone..Much more frightened than a 12 yr old boy...
A victim's will to report is irrelevant. Once again you're making several very sexist assumptions here which have nothing to do with objective adjudication.
On top of that no 12 yr old boy that had sex with his teacher will fail in life and hold that sexual encounter responsible. Women will take that to the grave emotionally...
"Accused #1 is free to go because the man he beat to within an inch of his life seems to be coping pretty well. BUT OMG LOOK AT ACCUSED #2'S VICTIM - SHE'S CRYING ZOMGWTF. HE ONLY STOLE HER PURSE BUT SRSLY SHE LOOKS SO SAAD FML - HE GETS DEATH PENATLY!"