FALL SALE - 20% OFF - USE CODE: FALL20 (24 HOURS LEFT)
November 22, 2008 @ 08:17 PM
Konglo

Post: 304

Join Date: Aug 2008

red monkey $ > dior $
November 22, 2008 @ 09:40 PM
BennyBlanco

Post: 133

Join Date: Jun 2006

red monkey $ > dior $


In terms of quality or in terms of gullable kids jumping on a bandwagon because of marketing? Dior wins in quality Red monkey wins in marketing to gullable youth.
November 22, 2008 @ 09:47 PM
bwssldr

Post: 1255

Join Date: Jul 2007

Those are BBC sneakers not vans you idiot, and there not even that baggy its probably just the angle because in the second pic they fit perfectly.

Fore Sale: Supreme Leopard M-51, Box Logo, Dior Jeans, Rick Owens, Etc. http://hypebeast.com/forums/apparel/211876#4274526

November 22, 2008 @ 10:16 PM

Inactive

Those are BBC sneakers


because that makes it better
November 23, 2008 @ 12:29 AM
internet

Post: 905

Join Date: Sep 2008

Location: Des Moines

because that makes it better


^ Hahaha truth.

Ryan I'm sure you've said this before but I can't find it...

How much did you size down?
November 23, 2008 @ 12:40 AM

Inactive

^ hahaha truth.

Ryan i'm sure you've said this before but i can't find it...

How much did you size down?


2
November 23, 2008 @ 10:31 AM
Invictus

Post: 259

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: New York City

Do MIJ 19cms stretch?
November 23, 2008 @ 11:30 AM
Konglo

Post: 304

Join Date: Aug 2008

In terms of quality or in terms of gullable kids jumping on a bandwagon because of marketing? Dior wins in quality Red monkey wins in marketing to gullable youth.


in terms of how much the jeans cost....you said he's better off buying red monkeys because he's wasting money on expensive diors that aren't supposed to be worn with that fit. if he buys red moneys, he will end up spending >$400. why spend $400+ on jeans when you can get better quality for cheaper and still get the same fit?
November 23, 2008 @ 12:33 PM
Evolve

Post: 454

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location: 41510

ok, now i do see something wrong with his fit. But if you ignore the shoes and hat in the second pic, the fit isn't too bad. I think everyone is just going ape shit because his outfit is... questionable. But in truth, the jeans don't fit too bad, although I think it should be sized down and [SIZE="4"]fix whatever the hell is happening at the bottom[/SIZE]; where it looks like he rubber banded themsad
November 23, 2008 @ 04:40 PM

Inactive

Do MIJ 19cms stretch?


in my experience, just enough to accommodate your waist, if you size down
November 24, 2008 @ 11:42 AM
LukieBaby

Post: 121

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: MD

somebody gimme some websites where I can cop these MIJ 19cm's. I dont' have the money but I wanted to see a price check
November 24, 2008 @ 07:13 PM
BennyBlanco

Post: 133

Join Date: Jun 2006

somebody gimme some websites where I can cop these MIJ 19cm's. I dont' have the money but I wanted to see a price check


www.eluxury.com
www.diabro.net
November 25, 2008 @ 11:24 PM
winter

Post: 98

Join Date: Nov 2008

this is how you wear dior homme jeans.
November 25, 2008 @ 11:32 PM
sellme

Post: 2189

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: toronto

Word, that is an amazing fit. How tall is that dude?
November 26, 2008 @ 03:14 AM

Inactive

Word, that is an amazing fit. How tall is that dude?


he hemmed...
November 26, 2008 @ 03:50 AM
sellme

Post: 2189

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: toronto

Yeah, I was like is dude 6'6'' or some shit?? Woulda been nice to have some more stacking but the fit itself is spot on.
November 26, 2008 @ 03:59 AM
winter

Post: 98

Join Date: Nov 2008

im 5"11, nearly 6ft.
and its not hemmed. (woops i meant it IS hemmed o_O)
they are 06 a/w 17.5cm MIJ
November 26, 2008 @ 05:30 AM
menace2

Post: 344

Join Date: Jul 2008

Horrible fit your better off buying some red monkey jeans or some rock and republic. One of the reasons Dior are so expensive is the fit and the only think your doing is looking like a misfit in them.

p.s diors and $50 dollar vans with patterns on them dont go well together.


nothing wrong with his fits

that's the Kanye West Dior fit.
November 26, 2008 @ 07:16 AM
Joe_

Post: 2742

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Australia

and that makes it acceptable?
November 26, 2008 @ 11:32 AM
Konglo

Post: 304

Join Date: Aug 2008

nobody talks shit when people sag their apcs and samurais below their ass.....and no jeans are designed to be worn like that.
November 26, 2008 @ 01:16 PM

Inactive

im 5"11, nearly 6ft.
and its not hemmed.
they are 06 a/w 17.5cm MIJ


i wasnt aware they made MIJ in 17.5....or do you mean youre a 27 waist in the 19s, which would be a 17.5cm hem?

if its a 19cm cut, its too tight btw
November 26, 2008 @ 01:45 PM
va5ts71e

Post: 35

Join Date: Nov 2008

this is how you wear dior homme jeans.


yuck, what am i a hipster?
November 26, 2008 @ 04:20 PM
winter

Post: 98

Join Date: Nov 2008

they are 27 waist, and i measured 17.5cm hem.
i dont think they are the 19cm cut.. bt mayb ur right?

i dont think they are too tight tho, i mean they are a tight pair of jeans but its meant to be worn like this.

or you think i should cop a pair of 31 waist and sag them below my ass??
November 26, 2008 @ 04:50 PM

Inactive

they are 27 waist, and i measured 17.5cm hem.
i dont think they are the 19cm cut.. bt mayb ur right?

i dont think they are too tight tho, i mean they are a tight pair of jeans but its meant to be worn like this.

or you think i should cop a pair of 31 waist and sag them below my ass??


they are 19cm cut...subtract .5 from the leg opening for every size smaller you go from 32, so a waist 27 in dior 19 measures 17.5 leg opening in actuality...imo, they look a little tight for 19s...like the claves usually arent skin tight...its not a bad fit though i guess

but you saying its meant to be worn like that is incorrect...we had this discussion 40 million times in this thread already, go back and look at the pictures from follow me that cheep posted and youll see what i mean...of course it could just be the angle, but in your pics they look painted on
November 26, 2008 @ 10:47 PM
winter

Post: 98

Join Date: Nov 2008

they are 19cm cut...subtract .5 from the leg opening for every size smaller you go from 32, so a waist 27 in dior 19 measures 17.5 leg opening in actuality...imo, they look a little tight for 19s...like the claves usually arent skin tight...its not a bad fit though i guess

but you saying its meant to be worn like that is incorrect...we had this discussion 40 million times in this thread already, go back and look at the pictures from follow me that cheep posted and youll see what i mean...of course it could just be the angle, but in your pics they look painted on



are you trying to tell me that my diors with 3% stretch is the 19cm cut?

if they were 19cm diors then obviously this isnt how you wear them.
November 26, 2008 @ 11:44 PM

Inactive

are you trying to tell me that my diors with 3% stretch is the 19cm cut?

if they were 19cm diors then obviously this isnt how you wear them.


i misunderstood you then obviously...i wasnt aware raws came in 17.5 now...i assumed you were wearing 19 because of all the commotion going on this thread about the right way to where them...my bad
November 27, 2008 @ 12:12 AM
winter

Post: 98

Join Date: Nov 2008

fair enough,,
i didnt mean any disrespect to any1 by posting the way i wear my diors.
and i probably worded it a bit badly, there isnt really a right or wrong way.
(except the oversized sag way aka kanye way or whatever it is haha)

i like the way your 19cms look in the first page btw ryan,
crazy stacking going on too ^^
November 27, 2008 @ 12:19 AM
sellme

Post: 2189

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: toronto

November 27, 2008 @ 02:06 AM
DC RA

Post: 467

Join Date: Jun 2007

another one for my fans
nigas sound like women.......

November 27, 2008 @ 03:23 AM

Inactive

nigas sound like women.......



ayo, ben baller, its a thread about jeans, du...what do you expect people to talk about other than the way they fit? would be kinda pointless if there was no discussion going on in here

Please login first to reply.
Back To Top