Free Worldwide Shipping
Spend $150 USD or more. Click for details.
September 4, 2010 @ 12:56 AM
zcy

Post: 24

Join Date: Aug 2009

use a measuring tape and measure the sizes in cm? that definitely cant go wrong. you got the pics already?
September 4, 2010 @ 01:08 AM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

pictures added!
September 4, 2010 @ 01:59 AM
jafeel

Post: 418

Join Date: Aug 2009

Better than i thought...thats all i can say
September 4, 2010 @ 12:35 PM
goldengoose

Post: 1285

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: LA County

hmm looks decent
September 4, 2010 @ 01:18 PM
C.Dante

Post: 4366

Join Date: Nov 2008

Location: NNNNJJJJJ

i WAS interested til i realized a 30 wouldnt go up to my thighs sad
September 4, 2010 @ 01:20 PM
GOLDENi

Post: 4377

Join Date: Jan 2009

Location: Illinois

Not feelin' it.

When you make 34's, hopefully you'll make a straight cut.
September 4, 2010 @ 01:27 PM
hyperpiper45

Post: 110

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: UK

The checkered pair looks really bad, and the cut looks weird aswell. The back selvedge pair look tight as hell too!
September 4, 2010 @ 02:09 PM
TTHX

Post: 755

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Ontario, Canada

i like em both. if i could get measurements for the 2nd pair thatd be awesome.

http://tonyhoangphoto.com

September 4, 2010 @ 02:57 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

not sure what u meant by back selvedge pair, but these pictures don't really do justice, it really ain't that bad like, its not as tight as you would think, unless ur not the right size...
September 4, 2010 @ 02:59 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

like same with cheap mondays...my cheap monday pair looks quite similar to the second one, it starts out tight but it turns out fitting well at the end
September 4, 2010 @ 03:02 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

and to goldeni, the first pair im pretty sure is a straight cut, its just that the fit pics were taken to have it look kinda tight
September 4, 2010 @ 03:05 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

tbh I don't like the checkered design razz
September 4, 2010 @ 03:08 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

well u wouldnt really see it when its worn because its the INSIDE, if u look closely u will see that the pant legs are rolled up
September 4, 2010 @ 03:22 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

back pockets also look a bit awkward
September 4, 2010 @ 03:28 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

yeah it may seem a bit awkward, but it was made that way for that low rise effect... but its only a tad lower, not so low that it would be behind your thighs
September 4, 2010 @ 03:33 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

smileWell it's a work in progress so I'm sure it will turn out good
September 4, 2010 @ 03:34 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

yeah, im really hoping so :/
September 4, 2010 @ 03:39 PM
Guapamole

Post: 3956

Join Date: Jan 2009

first ones, not so much.....

the 2nd ones look like they could have some potential man, i would advise a few tweaks
September 4, 2010 @ 03:39 PM
JesussaveS

Post: 221

Join Date: Oct 2006

inside patchwork is extremely ugly, dunno why you went with that. sometimes people have to cuff the jeans....

extremely awkward fitting and backpockets. from what i read these are chinese made?? dunno about that quality homie.

i eat boxes

September 4, 2010 @ 03:47 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

first ones, not so much.....

the 2nd ones look like they could have some potential man, i would advise a few tweaks


Yea I agree the second ones look a bit to skinny if you made it a bit wider than they would be &)&)&)
September 4, 2010 @ 03:48 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

thx for the feedback, ill really consider taking out the checkered inside for the next few pairs, and as for the quality, it really isnt that bad, a few of my buddies tried it on and they thought it was pretty good for china made quality.... i will most likely post up the measurements tonite..
September 4, 2010 @ 03:49 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

Yea I agree the second ones look a bit to skinny if you made it a bit wider than they would be &)&)&)


they will loosen up, :D the pics were taken when the guys wore it brand new
September 4, 2010 @ 03:53 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

they will loosen up, :D the pics were taken when the guys wore it brand new


True I guess we really wouldn't know until someone wore them for a while
September 4, 2010 @ 03:56 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

wait where are the pics??? confusedconfusedconfused dont see any


Page 1 brah
September 4, 2010 @ 04:11 PM
hyperpiper45

Post: 110

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: UK

not sure what u meant by back selvedge pair, but these pictures don't really do justice, it really ain't that bad like, its not as tight as you would think, unless ur not the right size...


Sorry, meant the black pair. Although they seem to be just really dark indigo at a second look.

Would be nice if you could get some close up pics to show the quality/selvedge.
September 4, 2010 @ 04:24 PM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

close up pics added
September 4, 2010 @ 04:25 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

close up pics added


Looks ok not THAT great
September 4, 2010 @ 09:40 PM
CⒶM

Post: 875

Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: Area

wers the cotton grown

Not with a bang but a whimper

September 4, 2010 @ 10:57 PM
NahMean

Post: 187

Join Date: Mar 2010

Location: WoofWoof

thnx breh


and as for the pants, well.... confused

why checkered? and are you making a cut that is not so slim, oh and do you have inseam measurements plus pics of the selvedge inside the pants

kbaithnx


Agreed. cool
September 5, 2010 @ 02:13 AM
yakultaddict

Post: 158

Join Date: Sep 2009

the cuts arent that slim, pics were taken when they were tried on brand new

Please login first to reply.
Back To Top