Urbanoutfitters - unbranded 14.5 oz japanese selvage denim

November 12, 2009 @ 11:40:53
what ever happened to the day where people just bought the jeans they like? whatever i said earlier in this thread scratch that out.

Does it really matter?
What if urbanoutfitters sold samurai would that make them the worst jeans.
Denim enthusiasts can love it or hate to them their own opinion.
Some people just want jeans.
Some just want raw denim for looks
Some just might be interested in the cut.

Ya they advertise it as Japanese denim with all the features so what? WELCOME TO AMERICA they want money.

I would fool half you fools into buying "japanese denim" to make money I'd give a fuck less, it would put money in my pocket to buy real denim.
November 12, 2009 @ 19:09:02
They look like shit, look at that pattern, what the hell? They look like a poor attempt at Japanese denim in general.

Go to Uniqlo and cop the $80 Japanese Selvedge Denim's they have, way better.

?????
November 13, 2009 @ 00:03:39
i just gotem in the mail. im satisfied ill try to put up pics too la zy right nowsmokeyface

This post is hidden due to user account is no longer active or improper post content.

November 13, 2009 @ 00:34:57
everybody says theyll post pictures
the 3sixteen thread is full of them
November 13, 2009 @ 01:08:51
my roommate has one of those photo cameras and i have an iphone should how am i gna use this usb tiny pic done?im lazy
November 13, 2009 @ 01:11:10
smh @ qualitynerds

If it's cheap, just keep buying it and take better care of your shit next time. You guys aren't even in it for the quality, just the branding and the e-props you get for your WDYT fit.
smh
November 13, 2009 @ 15:23:00
Saw the tapered fit in person. Fit is nice, denim quality is alright for the price. Construction wise, MIJ uniqlo's are probably better (I'm just going by what I remember when I last visited Uniqlo, I don't actually own the MIJs). It's Japanese denim but made in China. They aren't thin like someone posted earlier; my maiden noirs are thin compared to these. Without having measuring tape in hand, they seem pretty true to size. Granted it's too early for anyone to report on the stretch characteristics but my initial thought is that going down more than 1 size would be ball crushing.

Oh and there is a brand. It's actually called "the unbranded brand" - theunbrandedbrand.com. i don't know whether it's one of urban's in-house labels or just exclusively sold at urban at the moment.
November 13, 2009 @ 16:02:01
its the internet, i culd spl go spek yoda yes talk and the brain automaitclly reogcnzies the wrds. so if you can't decipher it slightly, then w/e.

what i was saying.
1. i refuse to believe urban outfitters is helping the consumer out in any way, except lining their pockets.
2. urban outfitters is like the target of "urban". target and walmart for that, carry body wash that is packaged nearly identical to that of old spice high endurance body wash at half the price. i am comparing it to that situation as urban is doing the same thing in my mind. the label even says this is not old spice high endurance or w/e
3. they tried to sell fixed gear bikes for 300$, shits 24lbs. they ain't right in my mind when you can do much better for the same price. again this is a reference to lining their own pockets vs. say actually for the consumer.
4. for 78 dollars, many buyers will be dissatisfied with the fit or feel and these will be in the marketplace or handed down.
5. you about to stalk me and give me a F for grammar and writing some more?
easy enough for you college kiddo?
~Lefty

patiently awaits the reviews once those who ordered receive.


cliff notes?

(•_•). ( •_•)>⌐□-□. (⌐□_□)

November 13, 2009 @ 16:34:14
Originally posted by Inactive User
cliff notes?


1. stubborn bullshit about making money

2. uo targets the urban/hip demographic just for more money. more stubborn bullshit.

3. they sell a product. I don't like it. I didn't buy it, but still.

4. I didn't buy these pants, but I bet they're not up to my high standards of fitmuntz

5. shots fired
November 13, 2009 @ 17:52:25
^this *****..is a kno it all
November 13, 2009 @ 18:05:23
^ post fit pics
November 13, 2009 @ 20:44:45
Saw the tapered fit in person. Fit is nice, denim quality is alright for the price. Construction wise, MIJ uniqlo's are probably better (I'm just going by what I remember when I last visited Uniqlo, I don't actually own the MIJs). It's Japanese denim but made in China. They aren't thin like someone posted earlier; my maiden noirs are thin compared to these. Without having measuring tape in hand, they seem pretty true to size. Granted it's too early for anyone to report on the stretch characteristics but my initial thought is that going down more than 1 size would be ball crushing.

Oh and there is a brand. It's actually called "the unbranded brand" - theunbrandedbrand.com. i don't know whether it's one of urban's in-house labels or just exclusively sold at urban at the moment.


I wish Uniqlo had a deep indigo colorway, one reason why I'm interested in the UO. I'm also going to cop Uniqlo black anyways
November 13, 2009 @ 21:01:06
go true to size i got the slim/straight fit and these need a bit of strechtin out everything else is good.its selveged the 5th small pocket has a selvege too.can i use my phone to post pics?
November 13, 2009 @ 21:08:05
^yeah, i just wanna see what they look like on a NON-urban outfitters model
November 13, 2009 @ 22:53:41
go true to size i got the slim/straight fit and these need a bit of strechtin out everything else is good.its selveged the 5th small pocket has a selvege too.can i use my phone to post pics?


When you're gona post pics bro? lol
November 13, 2009 @ 23:43:00

Inactive User

A buddy of mine just picked up a pair at UO. Just wanted to post some fit pics here since nobody has seen any on other than the UO page. They run long and stack well. These are the UB101 skinnys. For 78 bucks you aren't going to find a 14.5oz selvage jeans anywhere else.



November 14, 2009 @ 00:00:54
dat patch
November 14, 2009 @ 00:02:40
Not to be mean or anything. No hate to UO. But they're ugly as fuck.
November 14, 2009 @ 00:06:35
they do look really long. how'd your friend size on those?
November 14, 2009 @ 00:11:25

Inactive User

they do look really long. how'd your friend size on those?


He's about 5'11, 150 pounds size 31. I'd say he went pretty true to size. They do need to be hemmed a bit. I don't think he's going to be wearing them out like that.
November 14, 2009 @ 00:14:51
Not to be mean or anything. No hate to UO. But they're ugly as fuck.


elaborate? other than the patch and length they look fine imo
November 14, 2009 @ 00:17:19
It might be his ass that's making me hate them. Or it's the back pockets, idk.
November 14, 2009 @ 00:21:04
the stitching patch and fit are terrible as i expected

that looks more tapered than skinny
November 14, 2009 @ 00:22:01
well you said they are the skinnys
i dont like the fit

they don't look like a skinny fit
maybe for their jeans you need to size down
November 14, 2009 @ 00:29:19
It might be his ass that's making me hate them. Or it's the back pockets, idk.


Yea the back pockets do look quite big
November 14, 2009 @ 00:29:55
the models on the UO site wearing those jeans must be really tall or they sized down like crazy. compare the jeans above to the UO jeans, they look completely different.
November 14, 2009 @ 01:15:04
We need to see another fit or opinion about someone trying them on
November 14, 2009 @ 01:26:56
November 14, 2009 @ 01:44:17
lol yeah, that patch is big. all good, no one's gonna see it.
Please login first to reply.
x