The Official Uniqlo Thread

December 18, 2009 @ 13:42:33
New UJ T-000 wash!!! This wash looks really amazing in real life and they finally made it in the T-000 fit!



blinkyeyes Someone NEEDS to do a pick-up for me!!
December 18, 2009 @ 17:22:17
i dont get these fades under knee, dont like them either
December 18, 2009 @ 17:24:32
they finally got the UJ stuff in nyc then?

i think its a great range, the washes are all so nice

www.nagoyayom.com

December 18, 2009 @ 21:50:51
ya those are rly nice, mite need to pick those up for whenever i dont feel like wearing my MIJ's
December 18, 2009 @ 23:37:24
coloured S-001s back in

UJ versions

beige grey etc etc

http://store.uniqlo.com/jp/CSaGoods/280815-57#colorSelect

www.nagoyayom.com

December 19, 2009 @ 08:02:45
kidkorea thanks for taking the fit pic, they look good
December 19, 2009 @ 08:22:23
Anyone doing pickups on the beige ones?
December 19, 2009 @ 10:10:01
kidkorea thanks for taking the fit pic, they look good


No doubt, I forgot to mention the fit posted is a t000 sized UP 1. Much more comfortable in the waist and thighs and still very slim from the knee down.

ii-se.co Instagram: @iiseSEOUL Search "iise" on Facebook and like the page to support!

December 19, 2009 @ 23:52:05
coloured S-001s back in

UJ versions

beige grey etc etc

http://store.uniqlo.com/jp/CSaGoods/280815-57#colorSelect


anyone confirm they got these in NYC yet?
December 20, 2009 @ 01:08:53
^ UJs are in NY

btw, selling discontinued T-000s and S-001 Khakis in my sale thread, check it out!
December 20, 2009 @ 14:25:02
i need pickups on all of them

uniqlo's cust service been slacking on the return emails/calls
December 20, 2009 @ 14:55:19
yes, someone needs to provide those UJ T-000s
December 21, 2009 @ 14:56:57
I copped some UJ S001 (dark gray):




Very light. Not bad for $30. Gonna beat these shits up.
December 21, 2009 @ 21:59:53
Copped some UJ S001 (dark gray):




Very light. Not bad for $30. Gonna beat these shits up.
December 22, 2009 @ 10:22:24
Copped some UJ S001 (dark gray):



Very light. Not bad for $30. Gonna beat these shits up.
December 22, 2009 @ 11:31:48
^what size are those and whats the leg opening measure
December 22, 2009 @ 12:10:06
^ Copped some UJ S001 (dark gray / 33x32):



Very light. Not bad for $30. Gonna beat these shits up.

Leg opening: 7.5"
December 23, 2009 @ 01:03:00
t-000 khakis are making a comeback in Spring correct?
December 23, 2009 @ 21:25:00
I just got a pair of the t001 UJ jeans, just curious but what's thedifferwnce
Bren these and the old models? I will provide a fit pic too if anyone is interested
December 23, 2009 @ 21:33:25
^ the new line seems to be using a lighter weight fabric. the construction seems have taken a dip compared to the older line - from what i saw, they also don't have the leather patch any more. can't really complain too much though, they lowered the price as well.
December 24, 2009 @ 01:05:46
are there any s002's instock at the ny store?
December 24, 2009 @ 02:06:46
damn the leg opening is 7.5, yuck

how about the t-000, whats the leg opening for those in the UJ fit? i'm anxious to do a phone order
December 24, 2009 @ 09:00:04
are there any s002's instock at the ny store?


Yea, I do remember seeing the s200 while I was at the store last time
December 24, 2009 @ 10:51:54
are there any s002's instock at the ny store?


Everything is in stock at the NYC store.

damn the leg opening is 7.5, yuck

how about the t-000, whats the leg opening for those in the UJ fit? i'm anxious to do a phone order


Why yuck?

7.5 is decent. Just be happy it's not 8" like the past S-001 models.
December 24, 2009 @ 11:06:16
I can't imagine a leg opening smaller than 7.5. Shit wouldn't cover any part of the shoe. Feminine.
December 24, 2009 @ 11:30:05
OhSnap - i've been wearing Uniqlo's for a while and don't ever remember the s001 model having an 8 inch leg opening? Maybe you wear a bigger waist size than I do
December 24, 2009 @ 12:47:32
^ I had a pair of 33x34 old S-001. Leg opening's roughly 8".

Originally posted by Inactive User
I can't imagine a leg opening smaller than 7.5. Shit wouldn't cover any part of the shoe. Feminine.


Truth.

Nigs need to chill with the taper. I like taper myself like the next guy, but extreme = fuck no.
December 24, 2009 @ 13:35:35
The fit from UJ Regular Fit Straight Colour Jeans are on point. Uniqlo is the shit.
December 24, 2009 @ 14:12:50
^ I had a pair of 33x34 old S-001. Leg opening's roughly 8".


Truth.

Nigs need to chill with the taper. I like taper myself like the next guy, but extreme = fuck no.


Truth but thats good to hear that the new s-001 leg opening is 7.5

Are t-000 leg openings bigger?

Also anyone willing to cop me a pair of beige?
December 24, 2009 @ 14:18:14
I'd also like to mention:

Note: With the arrival of UJ denim, there's been a decline in denim quality.


My UJ S-001 feel much, much lighter than a regular pair of denim. The price has also jumped down to show this.


If anyone wants the good quality S-001/T-000, the only ones available are through the people who are selling them. I doubt the original S-001/T-000 models are coming back.


Sparknotes: Uniqlo is cutting down on costs/material in favor of lower prices (more customers). Recession's hitting hard, folks.
Please login first to reply.
x