Post pics of sick cars

September 13, 2010 @ 01:47:51
is that beckham in the rolls? son of a bitch

Melo Gang All Day

September 13, 2010 @ 20:56:33
Naw bruh rotarys are frail as fuck,and aren't even on the same planet as RB's and the 2jz,hell a B18 can take more boost than any wanker motor.


dat ignorant fanboy statement. Any experience with a rotary?

^Your obviously a Mazda fanboy, Mike Whiddets car only makes around 450 hp with the quad rotor set up and it's nowhere near streetable, and you obviously don't know how much time,money,and custom fab work is required to make that much NA power from a quad rotor,put that same amount of money and time into a RB or 2jz and you'll be pushing 700hp at the wheels no questions asked. Import engines are not great at NA power, that's a fact. Come back when you actually know something about cars.

http://speedhunters.com/archive/2008/06/05/car-feature-gt-gt-mad-mike-s-rx7.aspx


For starters, the article linked is a 20B powered FD. I doubt the goal behind it was streetability, regardless of that fact I know of a couple street driven 20b's in the area, and one 4rotor.

The 4rotor Madbul made 500 and has an insane torque curve. I'd like to see one as flat and peaks (&holds) as early as that. The goal of a 4rotor setup in motorsports (specifically in Mike's car) isn't, for the most part, about max power. It's more about usable power.

I'm not going to bother addressing the money issue. The same can be said for any engine configuration. There's always going to be a cheaper alternative to the same amount of power. There's too many variables to account for to label one engine better than the next.

To end off, I'd still say the 26B sounds better than 99% of the engines out there.
September 14, 2010 @ 00:39:15
September 14, 2010 @ 06:53:21
is that beckham in the rolls? son of a bitch


Definitely is. SWAG.
*insertsomesouljaboygifhere
September 14, 2010 @ 12:40:49
i like ur style modernmischief

besides the red lip on the a4 :}
September 14, 2010 @ 21:20:35
this shop near my job workin on a batmobile lol

September 16, 2010 @ 16:17:59


dope gs inspired prelude
September 16, 2010 @ 21:28:19
lol, haha.
September 16, 2010 @ 22:28:25
Absolutely beautiful
September 17, 2010 @ 00:17:31
nah

Easy mang...

September 17, 2010 @ 00:30:42
IDK if this car has been posted before because I wasn't about to read through 140 pages. The Zenvo ST1:


Too bad Zenvo is only making 15 of these and they would go for like $1.3 million anyway. But they look cool and have almost as much power as a Bugatti Veyron.
September 17, 2010 @ 00:42:40
it looks and is shaped a lot like the audi r8. im guessing they're using the r8's chassis?
September 17, 2010 @ 01:34:43
dat ignorant fanboy statement. Any experience with a rotary?

For starters, the article linked is a 20B powered FD. I doubt the goal behind it was streetability, regardless of that fact I know of a couple street driven 20b's in the area, and one 4rotor.

The 4rotor Madbul made 500 and has an insane torque curve. I'd like to see one as flat and peaks (&holds) as early as that. The goal of a 4rotor setup in motorsports (specifically in Mike's car) isn't, for the most part, about max power. It's more about usable power.

I'm not going to bother addressing the money issue. The same can be said for any engine configuration. There's always going to be a cheaper alternative to the same amount of power. There's too many variables to account for to label one engine better than the next.

To end off, I'd still say the 26B sounds better than 99% of the engines out there.


Everything you just said is irrelevant,but back to my original statement,if you put the same amount of money into a 26b and a RB26,the rb will easily make more horsepower consistently,and rotarys are nowhere near as durable as the inline 6's,but if you want to continue argueing that's fine.
September 23, 2010 @ 17:49:51

Easy mang...

September 24, 2010 @ 18:42:41
Everything you just said is irrelevant,but back to my original statement,if you put the same amount of money into a 26b and a RB26,the rb will easily make more horsepower consistently,and rotarys are nowhere near as durable as the inline 6's,but if you want to continue argueing that's fine.


Yeap, cast iron blocks will get ya.

I was merely rebutting the ignorant stance you took in your original statement.

My opinion is, if the same amount of money and time were spent developing the rotary as was put into the more traditional flavour it'd be a more level playing field.
September 25, 2010 @ 18:09:35


blacked out ranges are the sickest fucking cars and that cls u posted is sex also
September 25, 2010 @ 20:55:33
just a few i've been feelin' lately




September 26, 2010 @ 21:04:08



smokeyfacesmokeyface

(Invalid img)

my goodnesssss
September 27, 2010 @ 23:15:52
September 28, 2010 @ 00:35:37

September 28, 2010 @ 08:33:49
That's a real hypebeasta..............3.5L V8 TT, rear mount



September 28, 2010 @ 14:33:26
You ruined the tailights. But do you.
September 29, 2010 @ 03:50:03



the wheels on the first BMW are horrible...

but i do like the second pic, that 6 series is clean as fuck
October 09, 2010 @ 18:46:52
^
that second beamer is sick and i think the blacked out taillights look fine
October 09, 2010 @ 20:09:29
October 09, 2010 @ 23:23:25
Originally posted by Inactive User
*images*


Love the purple volks, but isn't having that window down increasing drag?
October 12, 2010 @ 16:14:24
Love the purple volks, but isn't having that window down increasing drag?


they have to be down when you autocross/ race. in case they need to reach in and open the the door.
October 13, 2010 @ 01:20:45





so dope. what do you guys prefer? 2.0T or 3.8?
October 13, 2010 @ 13:01:01
3.8 stock, but the 4banger gawts potential. EVO X block.
October 13, 2010 @ 19:53:22
(Invalid img)
Please login first to reply.
x