2013 BMW 3 Series | Hypebeast Forums

October 15, 2011 @ 01:36 AM

Sex

Post: 1250

Join Date: Jun 2009

More here

My garbage can eats better than 99% of the world.

October 15, 2011 @ 02:57 AM

Marky Mark

Post: 289

Join Date: Oct 2009

Location: Milwaukee

actually looks pretty good. I absolutely hated E90

October 15, 2011 @ 03:11 AM

╒rozzy

Post: 1708

Join Date: May 2011

Location: San Jose, CA

I honestly dislike how BMW uses the same styling cues in all the series'
Like how the rear end from this angle looks alot like a F10

.

October 15, 2011 @ 03:24 AM

GhandiG

Post: 177

Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: Los Angeles

Nah old 3 series better in my opinion

http://twitter.com/#!/GhandiG_OG

October 15, 2011 @ 04:28 AM

ClydeFrazier

Post: 6407

Join Date: Feb 2009

all forced induction? RIP BMW

Melo Gang All Day

October 15, 2011 @ 06:29 AM

Cybrax2

Post: 529

Join Date: Mar 2009

<p>all forced induction? RIP BMW</p>

no, 2.0T could be fun and economical.

If it's like VAG's Turbo engines, it would be damn great on a rwd. If it's better, sheeeet.

I think this is BMW's attempt to allow the stealership to make more cash, as turbo would cause more mechanical issues down the road. iono

October 15, 2011 @ 08:51 AM

Trollinator

Post: 5030

Join Date: Jun 2010

Location: Location

pics of the coupe?

I want to see the world burn

October 15, 2011 @ 02:39 PM

The Main Event

Post: 1429

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: NJ

<p>all forced induction? RIP BMW</p>

This... and "the new 3 series is longer than an E34 5-Series, and only 6 inches shorter than the original 7 series."

A sad day for BMW

October 15, 2011 @ 06:54 PM

ClydeFrazier

Post: 6407

Join Date: Feb 2009

<p>
</p><blockquote>
<div class="quote-info">
<div class="quote-from">Originally posted by
<div class="quote-name">PootieTang</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="quote-content">
<p>all forced induction? RIP BMW</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>
no, 2.0T could be fun and economical.</p>
<p> If it’s like VAG’s Turbo engines, it would be damn great on a rwd. If it’s better, sheeeet.</p>
<p>I think this is BMW’s attempt to allow the stealership to make more cash, as turbo would cause more mechanical issues down the road. iono</p>

i had a VAG 2.0T in my GTI. It's a great little engine, but NA is far more responsive and enjoyable (not to mention sounds better)

Melo Gang All Day

October 16, 2011 @ 10:16 AM

thephreak

Post: 1116

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Irvine/台中

too early to tell if the turbo's will be a good thing or not. knowing BMW, they probably will not fuck up their bread and butter machine. if turbo's lead to better performance/fuel economy, why not. personally, don't really give a shit about responsiveness and driving dynamics for the non-M cars. we'll see if turbo was a good idea when the M3 comes out. if the N55/54 is any indication, it should be fine. BMW should have had enough time to develop a monster turbo six by now. mixed bag on the design though, not feelin it yet but maybe will grow on me.

I look how you wanna look, I fuck like you wanna fuck, I am smart, capable and most importantly, I am free in all the ways you are not.

October 24, 2011 @ 06:24 AM