June 11, 2009 @ 03:13 PM
CraftySince90

Post: 901

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: YB house, SF Bay Are...

That is the question.. Anyone have any info on which would be the better car? confused
June 11, 2009 @ 03:17 PM
iDANYO

Post: 6323

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: 510,Bay Area

I'd go with the RL. Didn't they discontinue the q45?
June 11, 2009 @ 04:51 PM
Hobbes.

Post: 694

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: Abq, NM

I'd go with the RL.

Ditto.
June 11, 2009 @ 05:30 PM
ahhhrt

Post: 2005

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: toe ron toe

Um...for what exactly?

As a DD, either would achieve the same thing.
June 11, 2009 @ 09:00 PM
Zachh

Post: 437

Join Date: Jan 2008

Q45 imo, I love those damn cars.
June 11, 2009 @ 09:36 PM
randysav

Post: 1007

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: norcal

Q45
June 11, 2009 @ 11:05 PM
itZj0k3R

Post: 586

Join Date: Sep 2008

Location: Youngstown, OH

Here's the Q45's engine bored out to a 5.0L inside a Z32!

VH45DE bored out to a 5.0L
Custom Forged High-Comp Pistons
Custom Rods
Custom Dry-Sump
Custom Long-Tube Equal-Length headers.
Custom ITB Setup
Custom Cams
Solid Lifters
Springs/Retainers/Etc.
Standalone

www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3hLQtXRAqU
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncxR7xNcSfI

Fcking Raw.


You should get the Q45 and get a sick as exhaust for it to make it sound like godzilla.


On the other hand, Acura 3.5l RL's are nice, what year?
June 12, 2009 @ 12:27 AM
est1984

Post: 640

Join Date: Mar 2008

Location: Seattle, WA





well thats my $.02 worth.

RL's are pretty mass market. Reliable? yeah, prolly. Residual = pretty good....but for me thats not what its about.
June 12, 2009 @ 08:18 AM
THiZZ

Post: 2677

Join Date: Jun 2007

Location: Los Angeles

As a ex Q45 owner i suggest you don't get one. Expensive to fix and on top of that they aren't easy on gas. They ride nice and they have good stuff. But if something goes wrong with them it cost alot to replace/fix shit. Trust me i had a lifter go out on mine and i got quoted at 650 in labor just to fix a single lifter...

-THiZZ
June 12, 2009 @ 02:43 PM
CraftySince90

Post: 901

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: YB house, SF Bay Are...

yeah im worried about the gas.. but i heard the engines are amazing. but ugh, i guess i'd rather spend less on gas.
June 17, 2009 @ 08:00 PM
Mr.Doback

Post: 224

Join Date: Jan 2009

Location: norVA

q45! here are my two of my friends cars, black one was already posted above but now soldsuprised







as far as reliability both cars have over 120k and they both run like a top, the v8s are pretty bullet-proof, the black q was at 175k miles when sold and the only problem was the front shocks were blown, otherwise treated him very well

just some incentive
June 19, 2009 @ 04:52 PM
MLGVALO

Post: 67

Join Date: Jan 2007

Q45
June 20, 2009 @ 12:05 AM
naRipsta

Post: 483

Join Date: Apr 2009

Q45 any day
July 6, 2009 @ 10:53 PM
D_renz

Post: 32

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: bay

go with the acura
July 7, 2009 @ 09:49 PM
projectSounds

Post: 51

Join Date: Oct 2006

Q45
July 8, 2009 @ 09:04 PM
tonyz92

Post: 19

Join Date: Oct 2008

Q45 all da way
July 8, 2009 @ 09:19 PM
rcar04

Post: 27

Join Date: May 2009

.
July 9, 2009 @ 03:19 AM
kidhype

Post: 1

Join Date: Apr 2009

q45, no question
July 19, 2009 @ 12:32 AM
naRipsta

Post: 483

Join Date: Apr 2009

Okay, I chose Q45 for ease of mounting low-offset wheels on it. The RL won't let you go deep without having to hammer the shit out of the walls. But that's just me.
July 22, 2009 @ 03:08 PM
wtfbbq

Post: 214

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: VA

Yeah, Q45 for sure
July 22, 2009 @ 07:51 PM
ice13water

Post: 1187

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: NYC

rl and muganize it
July 23, 2009 @ 05:16 PM
iHAG

Post: 147

Join Date: Jun 2009

Location: boston

love acuras but after looking at those pics up top id go with the q45
July 30, 2009 @ 12:15 PM
vikko

Post: 26

Join Date: Feb 2008

infiniti!

Please login first to reply.
Back To Top