Free Worldwide Shipping on Orders Over $150.00 USD or more - Use Code: HBSHIP150
July 6, 2008 @ 11:13 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Bah. Does the quality look like shit to anyone else?
July 7, 2008 @ 12:08 AM
Deemy

Post: 1835

Join Date: Aug 2006

Bah. Does the quality look like shit to anyone else?

It does look a little weird. But the third picture is still nice.
July 7, 2008 @ 12:54 AM
DunkPunk

Post: 4605

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: L.A.

indirect..


fireworx are nice.

CURRENTLY IN LONDON.

July 7, 2008 @ 12:57 AM
i-love-sole

Post: 806

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: SOLEcal

those lights hurt my eyes
July 7, 2008 @ 01:27 AM
Makepeace

Post: 1665

Join Date: May 2006

Location: New York

thnx for shitting on my balls indirect lmfao...crisp pics!

Bless.

July 7, 2008 @ 02:44 AM
krn_zmb

Post: 4066

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Bay Area

i actually like ur picture better sole
July 7, 2008 @ 05:32 AM
rickqlo

Post: 1049

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: melbs

philip, thats fckin nice for handheld.
indirect, that 3rd shot is fckin class. love it
July 7, 2008 @ 05:51 AM
teov

Post: 6605

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Greater Milan metro...



for some reason I got a passion for the bape logo


Blog : lifetimesofmrm.blogspot.com Check my tumblr lifetimesofmrm.tumblr.com HELGEN X. I love the fact that you don't dress like a fake poser skateboarding faggot from HB!

July 7, 2008 @ 01:27 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

yes. the overall shot looks clean, but the size you are posting causes a jagged pixelation. is there a reason you always post your photos so large? it takes away from the details when everything is so big. the eyes need a comfortable place to focus on in order to scan an image, and out of all the people who post snaps i find the most difficulty doing this when I look at yours. no hate, but maybe you want to post photos with a 650 width or less? jus suggesting...

also, to the guys doing long exposure etc. without a tripod... that's a no-no.


I posted those same photos on another forum and they looked fine. I guess it might have something to do with Hypebeast. I'll make them smaller next time I upload.
July 7, 2008 @ 01:42 PM
magneticman

Post: 4052

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: NW London

i Posted Those Same Photos On Another Forum And They Looked Fine. [size="4"]i Guess It Might Have Something To Do With Hypebeast[/size]. I'll Make Them Smaller Next Time I Upload.


|0
July 7, 2008 @ 02:26 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Well if the exact same photos were fine on another board what else would explain it?

July 7, 2008 @ 02:28 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Hypebeast changed to a fixed width forum. Supersized photos will not stretch the tables any more....

which brings me back to the question you didn't answer.... is there a reason you always post super large photos, do you think they look better? cuz they don't. anything wider than 750 pixels or so is going to look horrible. big photos don't make your images look any better anyways... which is what i was getting at b4. no disrespect tho...

P.S. - don't you use flickr? flickr gives you a medium size which is perfect for forums


Nah, I see what you mean. It's just the default on photobucket is to not resize the photos and I always forget to make them smaller.
July 7, 2008 @ 04:01 PM
Rizzo

Post: 338

Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: some where else.



July 7, 2008 @ 04:44 PM
Corn

Post: 88

Join Date: Apr 2006

Location: Copenhagen

I'm going to be buying a new lens for my D40 soon. I was thinking about the Sigma 10-20mm HSM (looks pretty damn good, affordable and will autofocus on my D40) or a telephoto. Probably a 55-200mm VR. What do you guys think?


Hey

Be aware of the size of the 10-20 sigma lens. Ive heard theres a problem with the lens blocking some of the light from the blitz on the Nikon d40 :/
July 7, 2008 @ 05:31 PM
philippeee

Post: 98

Join Date: May 2008

Location: NC

yes. the overall shot looks clean, but the size you are posting causes a jagged pixelation. is there a reason you always post your photos so large? it takes away from the details when everything is so big. the eyes need a comfortable place to focus on in order to scan an image, and out of all the people who post snaps i find the most difficulty doing this when I look at yours. no hate, but maybe you want to post photos with a 650 width or less? jus suggesting...

also, to the guys doing long exposure etc. without a tripod... that's a no-no.


and why is that? i know the results may be blurry but at 1/4 i think it's acceptable and the image conveyed what i wanted others to see just fine, albeit it wasn't perfect but i enjoyed the results.
July 7, 2008 @ 05:50 PM
malaujai

Post: 512

Join Date: Feb 2006

and why is that? i know the results may be blurry but at 1/4 i think it's acceptable and the image conveyed what i wanted others to see just fine, albeit it wasn't perfect but i enjoyed the results.


shit that was 1/4? LOL that merry go round was going FASSTTT! haha i was wondering why the other shit didnt look blurry for handheld...

meh, for 'daily snaps' no-tripod is fine...
July 7, 2008 @ 07:41 PM
AnmlHse

Post: 374

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Philadelphia, Pa

yo good stuff indirect...would've captured 4th of July but it was raining out here.


July 7, 2008 @ 10:45 PM
krn_zmb

Post: 4066

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Bay Area





July 7, 2008 @ 10:46 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Thanks AnmlHse!

And Corn, what's the blitz? Haha...
July 8, 2008 @ 01:57 AM
magneticman

Post: 4052

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: NW London

Well if the exact same photos were fine on another board what else would explain it?



do you realise how right that sounds?

I honestly think individual websites can affect the quality of images.
July 8, 2008 @ 11:12 AM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Hypebeast changed to a fixed width forum. Supersized photos will not stretch the tables any more....


Thus reducing the quality of the pictures.
July 8, 2008 @ 11:22 AM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

July 8, 2008 @ 01:16 PM
magneticman

Post: 4052

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: NW London

fuck!

It's not changing the quality though, it's just squeezing the image making it look aliased. The image is the same.
July 8, 2008 @ 01:39 PM
automaton2

Post: 33

Join Date: Jul 2006

a face in the crowd










July 8, 2008 @ 01:51 PM
indirectdelete

Post: 1900

Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Brooklyn, NY

I guess that's what I was getting at. My vocab when it comes to that kinda stuff is a little lacking, haha. I guess I should just host smaller sized images on HB.
July 8, 2008 @ 05:18 PM
AnmlHse

Post: 374

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Philadelphia, Pa

Just got the D40 and had to rep my city. will be updating site with more @ anmlhse.com/flicks








July 8, 2008 @ 06:58 PM
DREWKKAKE

moderator

Post: 9632

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: 707/562

that pidgeon shot is dope

Forum Administrator • @DREWKKAKE

July 8, 2008 @ 07:53 PM
Voyager

Post: 17

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: Bonn, Germany

Thanks AnmlHse!

And Corn, what's the blitz? Haha...


guess he means flash...blitz is the german and maybe even danish word for flash
July 8, 2008 @ 09:31 PM
KICKROCKS

Post: 878

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: 8(31)0







Good portrait right here
July 8, 2008 @ 11:45 PM
Makepeace

Post: 1665

Join Date: May 2006

Location: New York

Photoshoot:




Today:


Bless.


This topic is closed, replies are no longer accepted.
Back To Top