March 9, 2011 @ 09:58 PM
KDL323

Post: 102

Join Date: Apr 2010

Is anyone with a Nikon/Canon shooting with a Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8-4.5? I plan on upgrading my kit lens on my Sony to one. I'm already using a Sony 35mm F1.8 and Minolta 50mm F1.7
March 9, 2011 @ 10:00 PM
Koven

Post: 3593

Join Date: Aug 2009

Is anyone with a Nikon/Canon shooting with a Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8-4.5? I plan on upgrading my kit lens on my Sony to one. I'm already using a Sony 35mm F1.8 and Minolta 50mm F1.7


That doesent seem much better then the kit lens. You need an 18-50 with a constant 2.8 apeture.

all I do is sip espressos and listen to AZ -mrelllis.tumblr.com

March 9, 2011 @ 10:54 PM
whenarichniggawantU

Post: 1557

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: San Diego

been looking for a nice a film camera.

any thoughts on this?

sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pho/2248433882.html
March 9, 2011 @ 11:18 PM
Gutts

Post: 760

Join Date: Apr 2010

That Minolta is alright. But that price is a little steep. And the meters suck on those so you would need to get a light meter. Almost every thrift store in my area has Srt series minoltas and they sell em for like 5 bucks.

I would recommend a canon ae-1
March 10, 2011 @ 12:57 PM
KDL323

Post: 102

Join Date: Apr 2010

That doesent seem much better then the kit lens. You need an 18-50 with a constant 2.8 apeture.


Thanks, I'll look into something with a constant aperture.
March 10, 2011 @ 02:18 PM
SprNtrl

Post: 1079

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: The Athens of the Do...

Thanks, I'll look into something with a constant aperture.
Expect to pay much more for a constant aperture versus a variable one.
March 10, 2011 @ 03:38 PM
KDL323

Post: 102

Join Date: Apr 2010

Expect to pay much more for a constant aperture versus a variable one.


I already know what I'm expecting. Time to wait for deals. Hopefully the 35 and 50 suite my needs for awhile. I just get crammed shooting once in awhile when I go to places with limited space to move around.
March 10, 2011 @ 06:36 PM
Gary Oak

Post: 59

Join Date: Mar 2011

Location: Pallet Town

i just got a rebel xs with the kit lens and i'm trying to find some features in the camera itself. any suggestions? btw i'm more interested in landscape shots that anything else.
March 11, 2011 @ 01:37 PM
SprNtrl

Post: 1079

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: The Athens of the Do...

I would suggest you first read the manual front to back. You can also download the manual from Canon.

Some features are explained here: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos1000d/page14.asp
March 11, 2011 @ 09:03 PM
KDL323

Post: 102

Join Date: Apr 2010

Are there any Sony shooters on this thread?
March 14, 2011 @ 11:29 AM
Shanklin

Post: 9605

Join Date: Nov 2006

I'm curious...Could I still record video on my T1i with a FD lens and an adapter? I know I can take pics without AF and shit but will the video option work?

edit: also what are the pros and cons of a FD adapted lens vs the normal AF one? the price difference between the models make the FD seem evermore appealing.

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

March 14, 2011 @ 01:03 PM
SprNtrl

Post: 1079

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: The Athens of the Do...

I just looked into that recently as well. From my quick research it is possible, but it's a bit of a pain in the ass. One recommendation I've seen is to use an F to EOS adapter for manual Nikon lenses (albeit said lenses are usually more expensive than Canon FD).

Video should work regardless of lens.
March 14, 2011 @ 02:46 PM
Shanklin

Post: 9605

Join Date: Nov 2006

^Thanks man I might use this as option for the future. The price of all the modern Canon lenses are a bit too expensive for my wallet right now.

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

March 19, 2011 @ 11:48 AM
Yuichisuke

Post: 108

Join Date: May 2008

Can anyone recommend a decent quality/ decent price stand for use with a 47' octabox?
March 21, 2011 @ 07:51 PM
365Hustle

Post: 229

Join Date: Mar 2010

Guys I'm shooting videos on my T2i and have been hired for music videos more often now.
I have a 50mm 1.8 but the crop factor is 1.6x its too much.

I was thinking a 24mm 2.8 but then I lose some low light functionality. I saw someone else shooting with a 50mm 1.4 and doing a great job. Which one should I get?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyhxO5NOj0&feature=channel_video_title << This was shot with a 50 1.4 on a Panasonic Lumix

I'm thinking of getting the same thing for my t2i (50mm 1.4) and selling my 50mm 1.8 because me and this guy shot on the same night and his quality is a lot better - what do you think?

24mm 2.8 or get a 50mm 1.4 (I'll be shooting a music video in a party soon)
March 21, 2011 @ 08:42 PM
DREWKKAKE

moderator

Post: 9772

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: 707/LBC/HK

365 what are you editing with?

and im about to buy the sigma 30.. anywhere i can get cheaper than 450?

and shank, you cant autofocuswhile shooting anyways, so it shouldnt matter

Forum Administrator • @DREWKKAKE

March 21, 2011 @ 09:00 PM
365Hustle

Post: 229

Join Date: Mar 2010

Dr Ew that isn't my video thats a friend/rival of mine. He used Adobe Premiere pro to edit that.


I use Final Cut Pro
March 21, 2011 @ 09:04 PM
365Hustle

Post: 229

Join Date: Mar 2010

Is a 50mm F1.4 FD with an FD to E0S Adapter a viable option? Considering I mainly want to shoot video? it would save me
March 21, 2011 @ 10:29 PM
DREWKKAKE

moderator

Post: 9772

Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: 707/LBC/HK

fasho. im having trouble trying to recompress my 7d files to be used on final cut pro. im tired of using imovie somebody help me

Forum Administrator • @DREWKKAKE

March 22, 2011 @ 05:02 AM
365Hustle

Post: 229

Join Date: Mar 2010

use mpeg streamclip and encode them with apple intermediate codec
March 23, 2011 @ 04:52 PM
Shanklin

Post: 9605

Join Date: Nov 2006

365 what are you editing with?

and im about to buy the sigma 30.. anywhere i can get cheaper than 450?

and shank, you cant autofocuswhile shooting anyways, so it shouldnt matter

Word I know, I just wanted to see if the quality would be affected, the only thing I know of is that i'll lose an fstop or two with the adapter.
Guys I'm shooting videos on my T2i and have been hired for music videos more often now.
I have a 50mm 1.8 but the crop factor is 1.6x its too much.

I was thinking a 24mm 2.8 but then I lose some low light functionality. I saw someone else shooting with a 50mm 1.4 and doing a great job. Which one should I get?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyhxO5NOj0&feature=channel_video_title << This was shot with a 50 1.4 on a Panasonic Lumix

I'm thinking of getting the same thing for my t2i (50mm 1.4) and selling my 50mm 1.8 because me and this guy shot on the same night and his quality is a lot better - what do you think?

24mm 2.8 or get a 50mm 1.4 (I'll be shooting a music video in a party soon)


Fuck both of those and get a 28mm 1.8, the canon version is roughly 500 bucks, but there is a sigma version that's about 50 bucks cheaper. I was going to shoot a video at a party as well and I often find that the 50mm on a crop body is way to close for my liking in doors.

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

March 23, 2011 @ 05:00 PM
Koven

Post: 3593

Join Date: Aug 2009

Sigma 30mm 1.4 is the GOAT on a crop sensor.

all I do is sip espressos and listen to AZ -mrelllis.tumblr.com

March 23, 2011 @ 05:05 PM
Hypnotizedd

Post: 622

Join Date: Sep 2009

Sigma 30mm 1.4 is the GOAT on a crop sensor.


What would you say is GOAT on FF 35L?
March 23, 2011 @ 06:56 PM
TTHX

Post: 755

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Ontario, Canada

Sigma 30mm 1.4 is the GOAT on a crop sensor.


word. if you're on crop don't even bother with the canon 28 1.8

http://tonyhoangphoto.com

March 24, 2011 @ 12:01 AM
Shanklin

Post: 9605

Join Date: Nov 2006

Why not? Sigma has a shady rep with "bad copies". Idk I just prefer keeping my glass within Canon.

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

March 24, 2011 @ 12:09 AM
TTHX

Post: 755

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Ontario, Canada

tested both extensively. sigma is pretty much better in almost every way. the issues with sigma are overblown. when shit goes wrong with 3rd party shit people always let their mouths flap about it, but when it's first party they're like "oh, just return or send that shit in for service" which is what you should do with sigma. if you have some focus issues, then send it in for calibration or go to a store where you can actually test one.
there are always terrible copies, bad copies, okay copies, good copies and excellent copies of every lens out there. no two lenses are the same.

in canada we get a 10 yr warranty with it. it was also cheaper than the 28 1.8. pretty much no brainer.

but hey, people will always have their brand loyalties so whatevs.

http://tonyhoangphoto.com

March 24, 2011 @ 12:53 AM
smimu

Post: 46

Join Date: Oct 2008

Pentax
Are pentax camera good? iam looking particularly at k-7?....i want to upgrade from olympus e-500
March 24, 2011 @ 03:59 AM
Lloyd

Post: 556

Join Date: Mar 2009

Location: Norway/Nor. Cal

Why not? Sigma has a shady rep with "bad copies". Idk I just prefer keeping my glass within Canon.


Co-sign...

And the sigma issues are not blown out of proportion. There are waaay to many bad copies of the 30mm out there.
March 24, 2011 @ 12:09 PM
Swagging

Post: 108

Join Date: Jul 2010

tested both extensively..


Why do you people talk out of your ass so much?

You used it to take pictures of flowers, big deal.
March 24, 2011 @ 12:26 PM
TTHX

Post: 755

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Ontario, Canada

Why do you people talk out of your ass so much?

You used it to take pictures of flowers, big deal.


lmfao you're so full of shit

http://tonyhoangphoto.com


Please login first to reply.
Back To Top