gcdLXJQffZCJLWnOuG

June 23, 2011 @ 08:25 PM
bacontaco

Post: 225

Join Date: May 2011

Location: ATL

how would i achieve something liek tthis?


take a picture of a dude who looks like that so that the sun hits his face on the right, make sure his head is in front of the sky (so you can cut it out easier in photoshop).
for the background, take a picture of seattle from a boat, make sure its during midday, decrease the saturation and luminance of reds.

cut out the face, layer it on top of the background in photoshop, and then apply HDR effects until it looks like that image.

http://kylekukshtel.com

June 23, 2011 @ 10:44 PM
Shanklin

Post: 9490

Join Date: Nov 2006

^I would also say take 2 seperate pictures, one focused on the backround, and the other focused on him. Then cut and paste the two focused pictures together. Both approaches seem like they would work in theory lol.

But, how do I double expose like this?

See how the face is like a silhouette of the backround? Do I take a picture of the backround first or the person?

http://kevinshanklin.com/

June 23, 2011 @ 11:28 PM
bacontaco

Post: 225

Join Date: May 2011

Location: ATL

^I would also say take 2 seperate pictures, one focused on the backround, and the other focused on him. Then cut and paste the two focused pictures together. Both approaches seem like they would work in theory lol.

But, how do I double expose like this?

See how the face is like a silhouette of the backround? Do I take a picture of the backround first or the person?


some cameras (i know pentax's for sure), allow you to do this in camera. why you would want to do it, I have no idea, but for some reason it's a feature that they keep in their cameras. Yyu may just be able to get tricky with photoshop by messing around with blending options & masking layers.

http://kylekukshtel.com

June 24, 2011 @ 01:16 AM
Shanklin

Post: 9490

Join Date: Nov 2006

Oh nah I know HOW to do it in my camera lol, it's just that I don't know how to do that specific technique. So i'm guess im asking, what picture would I take first to achieve the double exposure above, the backround or the person?

http://kevinshanklin.com/

June 24, 2011 @ 04:05 PM
SHOGUNATE

Post: 508

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: Califas

Hey guys can you help me out. what's a good digital camera (not dslr) that would be the best for taking pictures of people?

something like the canon s95
www.lifeisaprayer.com/sites/lifeisaprayer.com/files/reviews/images/canon-powershot-s95-top.jpg
June 24, 2011 @ 04:28 PM
tehcake

Post: 739

Join Date: Oct 2010

Location: Queens, New York

Hey guys can you help me out. what's a good digital camera (not dslr) that would be the best for taking pictures of people?

something like the canon s95
www.lifeisaprayer.com/sites/lifeisaprayer.com/files/reviews/images/canon-powershot-s95-top.jpg


Ever considered micro 4/3rds?

www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830111452

Otherwise, G12, or S95 would do fine.

http://nyannyanpartycat.tumblr.com/

June 25, 2011 @ 01:27 AM
Radular

Post: 129

Join Date: Jan 2010

I am going to get the 60D cool
June 25, 2011 @ 02:29 AM
Hermaemberbam

Post: 2

Join Date: Jun 2011

Location: Romania

download Jack Falls movie in divx formats
Marmaduke Movie In High Quality The Last Exorcism film 2010 social bioware com/3222233/blog/58617]watch The Twilight Saga: Eclipse full movie hd watch new Autopilot film download download Ladyhawke dailybooth com/DanielFresh/16845751]Jackass 3 5 Movie To Download Free The Shouting Men Online The Shouting Men Hd Download forum ea com/mx/posts/list/2415321 page]Tracker Film Good Quality Download Divx Yeh Saali Zindagi Full Lenght Download The Real Robin Hood Hd Free usebn com/forum/topics/watch-starz-inside-fantastic]download of Starz Inside: Fantastic Flesh movie Watch Free online Mega Man download Horse Crazy 2: The Legend of Grizzly Mountain new film usebn com/forum/topics/watch-machete-film-high]Machete film 2010 watch the whole movie of From Paris with Love Six Bend Trap Review Movie forum ea com/mx/posts/list/2415317 page]Free Red Online Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths Hd Download the Battle 2009 download
June 25, 2011 @ 03:40 AM
Mikeyone4life

Post: 2199

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: LA

I am going to get the 60D cool


Great camera, I had a chance to play with it a month or so ago. I ordered mine Sunday, it should be here Tuesday I can't wait for it to come.
June 26, 2011 @ 10:36 PM
bacontaco

Post: 225

Join Date: May 2011

Location: ATL

60d ftw.

http://kylekukshtel.com

June 27, 2011 @ 01:15 AM
Kulig00

Post: 1147

Join Date: Oct 2009

Location: Sacramento

I have a d7000 after upgrading/downgrading some may call it from a d300, problem is i dont like the hd video on it and am considering buying a 60d with 18-200 off bh for $1300. My question is how smooth is the 60 fps 720? Or the 30fps 1080?
June 28, 2011 @ 11:45 PM
DAMN_

Post: 924

Join Date: Jul 2008

i have the 18-55mm lens that came w/ my nikon...basic lens kit. I've had it for like 2 or 3 yrs...should I just sell it? it seems like crap compared to the my 50mm...I also want the 35mm lens too...So should i get rid of it?

http://pureandgood.tumblr.com/

June 28, 2011 @ 11:48 PM
DE LUCKS

Post: 528

Join Date: Jan 2008

^yes if you don't use it often.
July 2, 2011 @ 12:51 AM
JesusIStheCURE

Post: 321

Join Date: Sep 2006

Does anyone know what the cheapest video capable dslr is? I believe it to be the D3100 for Nikon or the T3 for Canon is this correct?
July 2, 2011 @ 01:06 AM
tehcake

Post: 739

Join Date: Oct 2010

Location: Queens, New York

Does anyone know what the cheapest video capable dslr is? I believe it to be the D3100 for Nikon or the T3 for Canon is this correct?


T2i is what i would get. D3100 or T3 isn't worth it. T2i + Magic Latern is where its at.

http://nyannyanpartycat.tumblr.com/

July 2, 2011 @ 03:08 AM
DE LUCKS

Post: 528

Join Date: Jan 2008

what's so great about magic lantern?
July 4, 2011 @ 08:17 AM
AG1Life

Post: 208

Join Date: May 2008

Location: Arizona

Any tips on taking photos at night? smile
July 4, 2011 @ 05:06 PM
Kulig00

Post: 1147

Join Date: Oct 2009

Location: Sacramento

good tripod, for more sharp get a smaller aperture like f/11 or more. if you have vr or is turn it off and try to place tripod on soft ground instead of concrete since concrete will vibrate from cars depending on were your shooting. remote shutter release cable and your basically all set.
July 4, 2011 @ 06:31 PM
bacontaco

Post: 225

Join Date: May 2011

Location: ATL


www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykuy4qYip1U&feature=channel_video_title


most bullshit video ever. they neglect the fact that the best pictures aren't always taken on leica's. the dude making the video had a hard time trying to find a reason to justify the fact that the cameras were so expensive, even when they don't have the evil features like autofocus, so he had to delve into some pretentious argument about the nature of a camera. spare yourself forking over a car down payment, and just buy a solid dslr.

you can buy a leica when you're rich and take pictures of impoverished people and call it art.

http://kylekukshtel.com

July 6, 2011 @ 07:38 AM
jimmillion

Post: 272

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: The WhiteNorth

^ you must not watch DigitalRev TV very often then. Kai would toss Lok under a car to save his Leica from being ran over, he's that obsessed with viewfinders. The youtube series is more for comedy and to see what new product were released then anything else.

He's also a Nikon fanboy who tries to hide it by giving anything canon an over the top review FYI. cheers and happy watching.
July 6, 2011 @ 07:48 AM
jimmillion

Post: 272

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: The WhiteNorth

Kinda just have my D7000 and kit lens. Wondering if i should get a sigma 17-50 2.8 os, or the tamron equivalent? I want a mid-range zoom lens, i"ll look into uwa later suprised.


Damn I hope I'm not to late on this...get the Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM. compared to the Tamron it's light years above it. I've been debating between the two for the past month and just purchased the sigma. for the extra money the sigma has better OS, a lot sharper, and has better glass preventing vignetting. If that's not enough there's been a few cases where the AF motor on the Tamron has failed over the past two years.

EDIT: according to the MTF charts the Sigma is sharper then the Canon 17-55mmf2.8 aswell.
July 7, 2011 @ 12:40 AM
tehcake

Post: 739

Join Date: Oct 2010

Location: Queens, New York

Damn I hope I'm not to late on this...get the Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM. compared to the Tamron it's light years above it. I've been debating between the two for the past month and just purchased the sigma. for the extra money the sigma has better OS, a lot sharper, and has better glass preventing vignetting. If that's not enough there's been a few cases where the AF motor on the Tamron has failed over the past two years.

EDIT: according to the MTF charts the Sigma is sharper then the Canon 17-55mmf2.8 aswell.


Well you aren't too late. Gonna buy the sigma soon.

http://nyannyanpartycat.tumblr.com/

July 7, 2011 @ 03:51 PM
JesusIStheCURE

Post: 321

Join Date: Sep 2006

Is anyone in here working with the d3100? I've been researching the cheapest dslrs w/ video recording & it seems to be the one that best fits what I'm looking for. I was curious as to what some of you guys experience have been with it.

Thanks in advance.
July 7, 2011 @ 07:38 PM
Rema

Post: 244

Join Date: Mar 2011

Location: Somewhere

^ Not sure about the Nikon, but for that price I'd look into the Canon 500D
July 7, 2011 @ 09:46 PM
KDL323

Post: 102

Join Date: Apr 2010

Does anyone here shoot with a Full manual Lens? I plan on picking up a Rokinon 85F1.4. Its pretty much the same as Takumar, Vivitar and other Lenses. Its a full manual lens. Has anyone tried it before?
July 7, 2011 @ 11:22 PM
Its_SONIC

Post: 2228

Join Date: Jan 2010

Location: PHILLY

whats a good cam to start off with (need to record) d3100 or the rebel T3 (not the t3i)
July 8, 2011 @ 07:34 AM
jimmillion

Post: 272

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: The WhiteNorth

^ not to sure about the Nikon side, but the canon T3 is garbage.

It's canons stripped down entry level camera that has worst build quality then some of their point and shoot cameras. The video recording i would say is be on par with their P&S line and only because you're able to interchange lenses.

At the very least you should save up for the t2i.

Ask yourself this - is having it right now really worth having to upgrade again a year from now, as opposed to saving up for another month or two and upgrading in two to three years?
July 8, 2011 @ 07:36 AM
Rema

Post: 244

Join Date: Mar 2011

Location: Somewhere

Its_SONIC Out of the two I'd say the D3100, but as i told ^ I'd also look into the 500D
July 8, 2011 @ 04:01 PM
TTHX

Post: 745

Join Date: Feb 2010

Location: Ontario, Canada

Is anyone in here working with the d3100? I've been researching the cheapest dslrs w/ video recording & it seems to be the one that best fits what I'm looking for. I was curious as to what some of you guys experience have been with it.

Thanks in advance.


don't get the d3100 if you want to be doing video. it's garbage and very limited.
canon codecs are better for editing, more flexibility and you can get cinestyle for free.

get a t2i and magic lantern it.

http://tonyhoangphoto.com

July 9, 2011 @ 08:14 PM
Epic800

Post: 93

Join Date: Jul 2011

Location: Georgia

Crank the ISO and lower aperture.
Please login first to reply.
Back To Top