Official Film Thread

Dec 16, 2012 @ 20:26
mamiya 6 !
Dec 16, 2012 @ 22:48
^So awesome man. Also grats on graduating. I was looking into getting a mamiya 7, but im sooo attracted to 6x6 that I  HAVE to get a hasselblad. Anyway post pics soon.
mamiya 6 !
i was def considering 6x6. The 500C/M was my first choice, but I was sold on the portability of the 7. not to mention the lenses are fucking gorgeous. I also considered a that fuji 6x9 but decided that since it's so cheap i can put off getting one.

no 6 for the same reason. and 6x7 is great because you can get that extra space for panoramic. i'm like flipping looking at the size of the negative. my 60D won't be able to touch it.

http://kylekukshtel.com

Dec 17, 2012 @ 01:44
im selling a 503cw.  you guys wanna check it out?
Dec 18, 2012 @ 17:47
what's good people. it's been a while. i met up with this dude to buy his T4 but when i arrived he told me he sold it to another dude like 30 mins before me. so he gave me a big mini for compensation, no charge. def excited to test it out. the only defect is, the lcd is dead so it's on auto mode all the time


http://eightmethods.tumblr.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/olegdeleon http://www.purveyr.net

Dec 19, 2012 @ 06:16
great camera. wont be disappointed.
Dec 19, 2012 @ 17:20
i have a question for those more knowledgeable than me. ok so say i have two canon ae-1s. both of them have the same 400 iso film in them, but one has a 35-200mm 3.5 zoom lens on it, and the other one has a 50mm 1.8 on it. if i set the aperture on both of the cameras to 5.6, will the shutter speed have to be slower on the ae-1 with the 35-200mm lens on it in order to get the same exposure as the one with the 50mm set at 5.6? i am having this problem with my two ae-1s. i think its because the lens is so long that it needs more light to get the same exposure, even when the zoom is set to 50mm and the aperture is the same. 
Dec 19, 2012 @ 17:26
i have a question for those more knowledgeable than me. ok so say i have two canon ae-1s. both of them have the same 400 iso film in them, but one has a 35-200mm 3.5 zoom lens on it, and the other one has a 50mm 1.8 on it. if i set the aperture on both of the cameras to 5.6, will the shutter speed have to be slower on the ae-1 with the 35-200mm lens on it in order to get the same exposure as the one with the 50mm set at 5.6? i am having this problem with my two ae-1s. i think its because the lens is so long that it needs more light to get the same exposure, even when the zoom is set to 50mm and the aperture is the same. 
yes.
from here:
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-exposure.htm

"Technical Note: With many lenses, their light-gathering ability is also affected by their transmission efficiency, although this is almost always much less of a factor than aperture. It's also beyond the photographer's control. Differences in transmision efficiency are typically more pronounced with extreme zoom ranges. For example, Canon's 24-105 mm f/4L IS lens gathers perhaps ~10-40% less light at f/4 than Canon's similar 24-70 mm f/2.8L lens at f/4 (depending on the focal length)."

http://kylekukshtel.com

Dec 19, 2012 @ 21:54
no way dude

if you have iso 400 in both and you have the same speed and aperture it will be exposed the same way. 

when you use an external meter there is no setting for focal lenght or brand of camera. 
Dec 19, 2012 @ 22:17
^Hey i messaged u about the 503

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

Dec 19, 2012 @ 23:59
yeah idk, shits weird. i figured it would be the same regardless of the length of the lens. i thought maybe the meter was messed up in one of the ae-1s. oh well, we'll see when i get my pictures back.
Dec 21, 2012 @ 03:50


Dec 21, 2012 @ 04:06
recently started shooting film and shooting more seriously and hence posting said images on flickr as well as tumblr. tumblr is not all original content but I try to slim down amount of reblogs and what not
feel free to follow
http://www.flickr.com/photos/luccaxverrelli
http://luccaxverrelli.tumblr.com/
some recent shots I like





http://luccaxverrelli.tumblr.com

Dec 21, 2012 @ 18:22
recently started shooting film and shooting more seriously and hence posting said images on flickr as well as tumblr. tumblr is not all original content but I try to slim down amount of reblogs and what not
feel free to follow
http://www.flickr.com/photos/luccaxverrelli
http://luccaxverrelli.tumblr.com/
some recent shots I like
I followed you. 

I want to post up some film stuff but I need to get a scanner that will scan my negatives since Walgreens obviously can't scan images onto a disc correctly. I have yet to take anything all that great though. 

jacobskoglund.com

Dec 21, 2012 @ 21:12
Originally posted by Inactive User
recently started shooting film and shooting more seriously and hence posting said images on flickr as well as tumblr. tumblr is not all original content but I try to slim down amount of reblogs and what not
feel free to follow
http://www.flickr.com/photos/luccaxverrelli
http://luccaxverrelli.tumblr.com/
some recent shots I like
I followed you. 

I want to post up some film stuff but I need to get a scanner that will scan my negatives since Walgreens obviously can't scan images onto a disc correctly. I have yet to take anything all that great though. 
i recommend the epson v700. amazing piece of work
Dec 21, 2012 @ 23:23
Any suggestions for replacement film holders for the V600 or settings? I'm using the software it came with and its giving OK results but what do you guys use?
Dec 22, 2012 @ 00:09
Any suggestions for replacement film holders for the V600 or settings? I'm using the software it came with and its giving OK results but what do you guys use?
Are you using the Epson software or Silverfast? Mine came with silverfast and its 10x better.

Dec 22, 2012 @ 01:28
interesting. I have a the v600 too. i use the epson software. works fine for me. I always scan on professional mode so i can tweak the settings to my liking if i have too.
Dec 22, 2012 @ 01:33

been on b&w feel lately.
Dec 22, 2012 @ 02:10





Dec 23, 2012 @ 00:15
Epson v600 + Vuescan = smokeyface

http://kevinshanklin.com/ IF YOU HAVE A FFFOUND.COM INVITE MSG ME

Dec 23, 2012 @ 02:37
-------------accidental double post
Dude I didn't even submit my pictures to the scholastic thing and it was for the most stupid reason. I regret it now. 
Dec 23, 2012 @ 02:43
Dec 23, 2012 @ 06:44
Originally posted by Inactive User
-------------accidental double post
Dude I didn't even submit my pictures to the scholastic thing and it was for the most stupid reason. I regret it now. 
what happened?

̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏ ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏ https://soundcloud.com/bkbrown

Dec 23, 2012 @ 09:23
(Invalid img)

now i gotta save up for a lens lmfao 
Dec 23, 2012 @ 18:15

been on b&w feel lately.
What film did you used? 
Did you do any digital post-processing?

http://briezrs.wordpress.com/

Dec 23, 2012 @ 21:58
@briezrs
I usually use hp5+ or tri-x for b&w. color I use fuji pro 400h and portra 400
Yea I do. I add a black border to keep the the viewers eyes drawn to the center of the picture. It's a thing I picked up from one of favorite photographers.
Also I adjust a little contrast at times just like how you would adjust contrast when you would work in the dark room. 
If I cant do it in the darkroom I usually don't do it on photoshop. (I try to match the tones to how my darkroom print looks like).
Dec 23, 2012 @ 23:07

too many cameras
just started a roll in this last week lol

̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏ ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏ https://soundcloud.com/bkbrown

Dec 24, 2012 @ 00:08
@keo_0 straight sexy.
I'm waiting for a black G2 to pop up for a good price. Carl Zeiss lenses are amazing.
get that 45mm f/2
Dec 24, 2012 @ 04:51
canon 500n w/ expired polaroid 400 iso



Dec 24, 2012 @ 04:52
was very surprised by how contrasty the film was being it was expired cheap ass polaroid/walmart film.
Please login first to reply.