Blogs / Phillip T. Annand / The Endless Pursuit.

The Endless Pursuit.
May 14, 2009

sty5
Street Etiquette x The Award Tour. Manhattan, NYC. 2008.

Style. A five letter word creates the biggest debate and controversy over who has it and who is merely play acting. I'm only going to touch on one part of the dialogue today because considering the way I write, going deep into the entire issue would probably take more than a few blog posts and more than a few weeks.

The biggest topic that has to come up in this discussion is influence. Quite simply there is nothing that anyone does without prompts and direction from a past source. Where you derive your inspiration from however is what begins to make the situation interesting. Considering the fact that you are reading this here on Hypebeast, the large majority of the readers of this blog, look to outlets such as this site and others for the items that have received the essential stamp of "cool." Whether or not most will care to admit it, someone else behind a screen and a few blogs decide that such and such label is "cool" and that in turn very often leads to such labels ending up on the back of the reader in a mere matter of weeks.

sty3
King D, Me, Juice. Philadelphia. 2008.

Take a look at the photo above that pictures myself and some of my brethren last year. Besides the disgusting over abundance of plaid that prompted us all to cease wearing any sort of flannel there is one other common thread. Labels. On every surface of the clothing, on every available place, the brand name is present. It may be a little hard to spot because of the angle but each hat is either adorned with Award Tour or Supreme, each jean has its particular brand, and all the shirts are plastered with their respective companies logo.

I'm not saying there is anything wrong with this, As you can see, I am a participant in the system, but observe how obvious the brands placement is. Regardless of what coast you are from, or what city you reside in, if you are a member of the "streetwear omniverse" than you focus on your labels. Its a running joke around the Hypebeast community that the standard uniform is Supreme, APC, and Vans. I wish god's blessing on the poor ill informed souls that somehow end up on the Hypebeast forums and attempt to post "WDYWT" fits that are outside of the accepted norm. The backlash they receive although frequently comical is nothing short of ridiculous.

The Supreme, APC, Vans quip is not far from the truth, individuals are consumed with presenting themselves within the definition of what a few members of the community have decided is the definition of streetwear "cool." Visit a line up in front of any boutique for a release and you will see an endless line of the same brands over and over again.

I'm not here to say that every label should reconsider, rather I'd like to highlight the contradiction in this scenario. Streetwear derives it's inspirations from two style generation in which labels were not of immediate importance. The number one influence on all of these labels comes from a subculture and a time in which labels largely couldn't be afforded, the skate and surf culture of the 1970's-90's.

sty2
Early Z-Boys. Venice, California-1970s. Image credit: Rockers NYC.

Take a look at this photo and realize the separation between it and the picture from last year above. The subjects in both pictures are younger kids, caught in a subculture, only a few decades apart, and as far as the style is concerned it's not entirely changed but there is one distinct difference: the absence of labels in the photo directly above. The kids above are wearing the clothes they have in complete confidence, with complete "swagger" (Hate the word.), and assurance of themselves without the inclusion of labels pasted across their clothes.

To some extent, given the background we know about kids in this era, more expensive "labeled clothing" was probably not largely available. In the rundown areas of Venice Beach where the culture was birthed, extra money was definitely not being given out for new clothes at the beginning of every school year. These kids were coming from relatively poor backgrounds and what was received was what was worn. The clothing they wore was for function, they turned what they had available to them into an original style that than came to define them.

The clothes did not define the style, how they were worn and who embodied the clothes defined the style. These kids didn't need a Supreme, Hundreds, or even an Award Tour pasted across their t-shirt to have themselves defined as members of their sub-culture, they merely were the culture themselves. There is an enormous departure from today in which in order to be a purveyor of the essential streetwear "cool," one must be draped head to toe in the correct brands.

sty4
Early Z-Boys. Venice, California-1970s. Image credit: Rockers NYC.

Granted of course there were labels at this time, Vans were still worn by skaters and they without a doubt had preference to what labels they would wear if they could, but that was not what was important. It all rotated around how you embodied what you wore. The labels came secondary. You could walk down the street in the most ratty of threads and still be jocked by every third follower and female because you yourself were the culture, style, and subject of the attention, not your labels.

Today, you recognize someone as a part of the culture based on the label. When you see someone walking down the street in a Stussy t-shirt you assume that they know their way around the street-wear omniverse. Back in the day, such a label didn't exist. You recognized someone because they had destroyed shoes, wild hair, and probably are carrying a skateboard that had actually been used. Those kids had a certain and a certain presence and swagger (Still hate the word.) that boldly stated to the world, I live the life. It wasn't the label that created the culture, it was the participants who created the label.

Anyway. Another post with far too many words from me, who am I to say anything anyway?
Looking forwards to hearing some responses.

Also all credit must be given to the guys over at Rockers NYC where the older pictures were taken from. Amazing history over at the Rockers brand.

Stay Safe-Phil.

1 Responses

  1. Rockers NYC » Blog Archive » RockersNYC presents:THEENDLESSPURSUIT. on May 22, 2009

16 Comments

  1. Posted by: Shootah4291 on May 14, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    i hope im not the only one who read this but i also hate the word swagger. But anyways im down with the levis but i cant stand the people who feel they have achieved something in life because they wear l-r-g or vans (when they know they are not a skateboarder). But ill sum it up now because i dont want to type any more words.

    Wale > anyone's Fav M.C.

  2. Posted by: thehighestsociety.com on May 14, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Mos def a good read. You have the best blog hands down simply for the fact that you have the ability to use more than 100 words and still keep your readers amused.

    Streetwear sucks. The term "streetwear" sucks. Sneakers suck. And I can't wait for kids to wear baggy clothing once more.

    -b.

  3. Posted by: ROBOT on May 14, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    I'm feeling this a thousand percent. Somtimes we as consumers buy what's crack @ the moment and disregard if the shits even decent enough to wear next month or in the following year. We get sucked into the "you're not up on this" and feel like you have to cop all these labels to be down. Anyways I'll stick to copping all my classic shit(levi's and lo)@ the local goodwill store. You can never go wrong w/the classics(and the prices).

    90's hop hop 4ever...peace

  4. Posted by: scienteest on May 14, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    another good thread. even though me and some others are def enjoying the read, I can't get rid of the feeling that something is going to waste here. I really hope that your studies lead to something bigger than this.
    on the matter, what you wear is just who you reach out to.
    I'm personally sick of ppl stating that they wear their own unique style. bottom line is that you always just sending out signals to reach out to likeminded people. this is still the same like in the 70s 80s and 90s. it's just the abundance of labels and niches that makes you more specific in what you try to impose. clearly visible labels just makes it easier to spot.

  5. Posted by: n.o. 4 life on May 14, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    this is a great blog and really the only one worth reading on the beast...i feel people become too consumed with labels...i understand why because the brands people wear often as a sign of who they are now...i blame this on the fact that now things are so diverse and ideas flow so easily across the world that what a skater,rapper,surfer dresses like isnt as set in stone as they where before they became mainstream

  6. Posted by: TiarafrmDetroit on May 14, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    I've never read my thoughts so eloquently echoed. Ever since I became immersed in this culture a few years ago, I've slowly but surely been feeling the same way about the whole "streetwear" thing. I wonder what it was called b4 "streetwear". I'm not sure if we should get back to the "baggy" look but, I think that the only way to truly solve this problem is to stop putting so much emphasis on clothing. Not to say that you should go out looking like who shot john, but taking 3 hours to decide on an outfit (usually some type of dark denim, stussy t-shirt and vans or supras) is just ridiculous. And no offense guys, but its mostly males who are making this culture suck so bad. In the words of the great Leah McSweeny (Married to the MOB) "Men are the new Women" Another great post Phil, keep me entertained...

    Tiara89

  7. Posted by: JKISSI on May 15, 2009 at 1:09 am

    Good looks on the shout out phil.

    Well written post right here I definitely agree with you on this I have been thinking the same.

  8. Posted by: ROBOT on May 15, 2009 at 8:03 am

    It sure is refreshing to read a blog that has so many great insights. Biggups to Phillip for coming up w/this subject. I keep coming back to this blog to read comments and quite frankly...all of Phillips posts have been crack. I'm hooked.

  9. Posted by: Atticus on May 15, 2009 at 8:04 am

    This stuff is Magic. By far one of the best blog writers around.
    Any plans on selling your stuff over here in little 'ol England?

  10. Posted by: SoHo B on May 15, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Woah! The response to this is wilder than I thought. Some pretty bold statements out here. lol. It's all fun though, the love is wild cool. Phil this was an excellent write up man. Fashion vs Style is like the Jedi vs the Dark Side, it will never really end but from time to time the Republic will flip flop on whom they favor... SoHo

  11. Posted by: ROBOT on May 15, 2009 at 10:12 am

    I just returned from my journey at award tour, of course I knew it was going to be good(loved the throwback movie talk of the Warriors,great film,I've seen it a hundred thousand times).Keep up the great work P.One more thing,I was open on how the jeans were aged by the hurricane you were in@ the campus jawn,I'm going to have to try that.

    peace(a fellow brethren)

  12. Posted by: Nolan Smith - Ventura, CA on May 20, 2009 at 11:56 am

    damn, i couldnt agree more with you on this topic. being from a southern california beach community its easy to seperate the kids who ARE the culture themselves from the ones who have to wear specific brands to look the part. For me, its as obvious to spot as an actor playing the role of someone you are familiar with. Its refreshing to see brands pay homage to small things in fashion that alot of times go unnoticed, for example: The Hundreds did a spin of the classic in n out burger tees, i think is dope they recognize how good those shirts are, but its no where near as o.g as the original. likewise, kids have been turning dickies' pants into shorts for years in my neighborhood, now the hundreds manufactures a similar style and the people dont realize where it came from. sometimes brands play off something and do it better than the original or improve on the original which is always nice to see, like the hundreds and their slim fitting dickies' like pants (i know, another hundreds example) everyone loved dickie pants but stopped wearing them when they became too baggy. your right about swagger, as much as it is overused sometimes its truly the only word that fits...

  13. Posted by: Roy on May 20, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    At the end of the day you should wear what you like, what YOU feel comfortable in. Honestly, its like some people get dressed in that 'supreme' logo tee nowadays in hope that someone on the street will approach them & stamp their forehead with a big ''validated cool'' stamp. Try hards are never 'cool' - you know who you are...... fu*k off.

  14. Posted by: king r on May 23, 2009 at 11:24 am

    'It wasn’t the label that created the culture, it was the participants who created the label.'

    so true.. love it

  15. Posted by: Samo on June 12, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Its good to to hear such an insightful point of view from someone so young and immersed in this culture. I sometimes feel that most of our generation is dominated by the "hypebeast" character that phil refers to in this post.

  16. Posted by: Lluvia on June 17, 2009 at 1:46 am

    wow I couldn't have said this any better, I'd love to re-post this on my blog b/c I feel my readers definately need to see this. If you can, shoot me an email, I don't wanna take credit for something I didn't write.

    peace, lluvia.

Leave a Reply