<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus EP-2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/</link>
	<description>Online Magazine for Fashion, Sneakers, and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yz</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-126501</link>
		<dc:creator>yz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-126501</guid>
		<description>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months... I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months&#8230; I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yz</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419686</link>
		<dc:creator>yz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419686</guid>
		<description>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months... I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months&#8230; I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yz</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419687</link>
		<dc:creator>yz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419687</guid>
		<description>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months... I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on Olympus! Instead of equiping ep-1 with accessories, they rendered it obsolete in less than 6 months&#8230; I will enjoy my ep-1 (besides, in photography the quality should still be on the pictures, not on the camera), but olympus is an untrusty company for its customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-122110</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-122110</guid>
		<description>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419684</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419684</guid>
		<description>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419685</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419685</guid>
		<description>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to see a micro four thirds with a simple optical viewfinder like my real rangefinder has rather than this monster electronic viewfinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replicant</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-122081</link>
		<dc:creator>Replicant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-122081</guid>
		<description>@Antwan:
The difference is the compact design. No one&#039;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antwan:<br />
The difference is the compact design. No one&#8217;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replicant</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419682</link>
		<dc:creator>Replicant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419682</guid>
		<description>@Antwan:
The difference is the compact design. No one&#039;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antwan:<br />
The difference is the compact design. No one&#8217;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Replicant</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-419683</link>
		<dc:creator>Replicant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-419683</guid>
		<description>@Antwan:
The difference is the compact design. No one&#039;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antwan:<br />
The difference is the compact design. No one&#8217;s going to argue that a 4/3rds would pack more functionality than an SLR (however if you put it side by side with an entry level SLR like the Canon EOS 500D the specs are quite comparable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFreshInEffect!</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/olympus-ep2/#comment-121927</link>
		<dc:creator>JFreshInEffect!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=141365#comment-121927</guid>
		<description>What are the frame rates in movie mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the frame rates in movie mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 4/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 470/471 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.hypebeast.com

Served from: hypebeast.com @ 2012-02-13 11:53:55 -->
