A.P.C. x Supreme Collection – A Closer Look

by L.A. Ruano, October 2, 2009

apc supreme closer look 1 A.P.C. x Supreme Collection   A Closer Look

Offering a closer look into the upcoming collaboration between French brand A.P.C and Supreme, honeyee created a short feature alongside Supreme founder James Jebbia, albeit the text is in Japanese, showcasing the three items from their capsule release. Included will be a pair of New Standard denim, Petite Standard denim, and two t-shirts to accompany the jeans. An official launch is scheduled for October 1st, 2009 both online and in-store and October 3rd for the Japanese market.

apc supreme closer look 2 A.P.C. x Supreme Collection   A Closer Look

apc supreme closer look 3 A.P.C. x Supreme Collection   A Closer Look

apc supreme closer look 4 A.P.C. x Supreme Collection   A Closer Look

Source: Honeyee

26 Responses

  1. Posted by: gmoney on October 8, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    they look pretty good in person…i mean how wrong can you go with raw denim? In regards to the F’ em..thats just real NYC attitude( about 90% of yous’ are not from nyc..guarenteed!)…i also think that the f’em is strategically placed where u would find other logos. whats more homo…having designer jeans with elaborate back pockets or a logo stating that they dont give a f#$% about branding…also, if you looking at dudes asses….you may want to inform ma’ dukes or wifey that you may be gay…

  2. Posted by: Mark C. on October 7, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    The idea of having curse words printed on clothes sounds very juvenile. This just may work for a certain demographic, I suppose. But having “Fuck’em” printed on my ass (of all places!) doesn’t sound appealing to me…at all.

  3. Posted by: Sunny on October 6, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    love it!

  4. Posted by: Good Conduct on October 4, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Dark Denim. Classic.

  5. Posted by: keicharones on October 4, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    like i want “fuck em” printed on my butt.

  6. Posted by: WEAK JEANS on October 3, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    “Fuck Em” Who exactly is “Em”(Them)? The government (politicians), religion, corporate america, a particular nation, or group of people… or anybody who would bother to post a comment about these jeans. Or maybe It’s? ‘ We know that the quality of these clothes that we are selling are not really worth the money that we charge for them, however our customers are such SUCKERS for a label- that they will foolishly buy anything that they are made to believe will make them less worthless then they really are, so Fuck Em!’

  7. Posted by: deeeznuts on October 3, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    those of you who dont understand supreme never even knew about supreme until last year and don’t even know the history of supreme…

  8. Posted by: keveoner on October 3, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    not many get supreme, im not a hypebeast, so i cant get into detail about the logistics of any f@#$ brand, but these are dope…i think the f em is for you haters..and to the dudes who constantly label s@#$ gay…guess what? THATS GAY! or the f’ em is for all you fashiionistas/ label whores..yeah you…. FU! or maybe we not supposed to get it …and that alone is cool enough…..my pair 34’s are copped. Cheers!

  9. Posted by: naples on October 3, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    A.P.C jus got degraded.not impressive.

  10. Posted by: ALLEN'S2CENTS on October 3, 2009 at 11:37 am

    After careful consideration, I decided not to buy the shirt because.. they just look like man-legs to me. Even if they aren’t .. the shading looks like hair and if I though it, I know someone else would.

  11. Posted by: heflys on October 3, 2009 at 6:19 am

    @Kiddynamite

    Uh, we realizes that it means fuck them, but the embroidery says Fuck’em. No one here has stated that it says “Fuck ‘me,” so, uh…….WTF are you talking about?

    And, this collaboration, for the record, is weak. All they did was stitch “f’em” on the back pocket of regular NS’, and charge more for them. Wow. So creative.

  12. Posted by: acro7 on October 3, 2009 at 3:16 am

    omg these are so dope. i want them so bad!!! so perfect!!!

  13. Posted by: KidDynamite on October 2, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    Jesus Christ some of you guys act like straight children. It says “F them” meaning “hey you, yeah f you!”. It don’t say “F me”. Straight children. But the jeans are looking good and for the price, they look even better.

    Btw f resellers buying up all the shirts already smfh

  14. Posted by: Connie on October 2, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    This is my conclusion: Supreme ran out of ideas, so now they’re making callabos with brands like Fruit of the Loom & APC and smacking a supreme stitching just to attract IGNORANT consumers to buy it for extra money when the quality is the same without the “Supreme” stitched to the piece. Fail.

  15. Posted by: BKE420 on October 2, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    like it or not…they probably will sell out with only 30-33 waist available currently….t’s are gone. their only $15 more than a regular pr of NS. supreme is one of the few brands here at HB that always have a shitload of posts positive or negative. well made product and not made offshore. you also can attribute the site crashing yesterday because of this release…that’s my guess.

  16. Posted by: drizzy on October 2, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    It doesn’t even matter what we think about these jeans. WE all know their going to be sold out, and sold on ebay for like 3 times the price and there are still going to be people buying them.

  17. Posted by: Mark on October 2, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    so simpel so dope !!

  18. Posted by: justkaws on October 2, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    another reason to give into the hype.. i love you supreme x APC raw selvage forever!! W)TAPS

  19. Posted by: dominick on October 2, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    The only explanation I can think of with the F’em stitching is that counterfeiters would find it too hard to make a fake of these (and thus not very cost-effective for them), since the stitching crosses over the pocket (maybe I’m wrong). Still, I can’t wear these out: there are kids all over the place and -at the risk of sounding like the old geezer that I am- it just wouldn’t be appropriate. I’ll stick with my off-the-rack Levi’s I guess —cheers//dom

  20. Posted by: Haz on October 2, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    I would definitely rock the T. I would definitely not pay the extra $$$ for the “Fuck ‘em” Stitching on the back pocket.

  21. Posted by: nagles on October 2, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    I love when my jeans tell people to fuck my ass

  22. Posted by: Kris on October 2, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    F em! ?? …..dumb

  23. Posted by: h0m0s on October 2, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    absolutely horrible. “fuck” on any apparel is corny to begin with. having “fuck em” on your ass cheeks is an open invitation for butt pirates. course that might be want you want if you’re bumping that fruit swag, but for the straight male there’s absolutely no reason to get these over regular ns or petits. meh, perfect item for the gay hypebeast.

  24. Posted by: magicmarleymar on October 2, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    clean!

  25. Posted by: IBM on October 2, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    You dont even get chain stitching with the kind of big money the will undoubtly be asking for. And fuck who exactly? Does that really look good on the back of your jeans? Somebody explain and I’ll listen. The tees dont even warant any kind of discussion. New blood please.

  26. Posted by: johnGEE on October 2, 2009 at 11:53 am

    these are so sexy. im horny