The Artwork of Mark Weaver

July 7, 2009Uncategorizedby L. Ruano209 Views

mark-weaver-art-profile

Coute Que Coute finds their latest artist showcase focused on the works of graphic designer Mark Weaver. The Atlanta-based artist’s design work can be found in various publications along with a healthy dose of vintage-style photography. More information regarding Mark as well as further looks into his work can be seen through his official website.

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

mark-weaver-art-profile

Tags: ,  
  • Pingback: Different Stripes · Mark Weaver blogged again

  • jeremy

    these would be dope album covers

  • jeremy

    these would be dope album covers

  • jeremy

    these would be dope album covers

  • jay g.

    anything can be considered art I suppose the question to ask is if its any good

  • jay g.

    anything can be considered art I suppose the question to ask is if its any good

  • jay g.

    anything can be considered art I suppose the question to ask is if its any good

  • Frank

    lol @ Ian, you sound like my mom

  • Frank

    lol @ Ian, you sound like my mom

  • Frank

    lol @ Ian, you sound like my mom

  • Dan

    @Ian, exactly.

    This shit has been all over FFFFOUND for months, now…

  • Dan

    @Ian, exactly.

    This shit has been all over FFFFOUND for months, now…

  • Dan

    @Ian, exactly.

    This shit has been all over FFFFOUND for months, now…

  • M

    oh word Ian i missed the part when u explain who the hell you are to say whats “good” or “bad” “modern art” which isnt even the proper description of these works. ignorance is bliss, isnt it?

  • M

    oh word Ian i missed the part when u explain who the hell you are to say whats “good” or “bad” “modern art” which isnt even the proper description of these works. ignorance is bliss, isnt it?

  • M

    oh word Ian i missed the part when u explain who the hell you are to say whats “good” or “bad” “modern art” which isnt even the proper description of these works. ignorance is bliss, isnt it?

  • bystander

    @ Ian

    I wouldn’t classify this as “Modern art”…. Modernism has very much ended in the mid 20th century and I think we are well into the movement of post modernity which is a movement of no particular set style… but then again I think this is just graphic design which in recent years has pretty much fused with what we consider to be art…

  • bystander

    @ Ian

    I wouldn’t classify this as “Modern art”…. Modernism has very much ended in the mid 20th century and I think we are well into the movement of post modernity which is a movement of no particular set style… but then again I think this is just graphic design which in recent years has pretty much fused with what we consider to be art…

  • bystander

    @ Ian

    I wouldn’t classify this as “Modern art”…. Modernism has very much ended in the mid 20th century and I think we are well into the movement of post modernity which is a movement of no particular set style… but then again I think this is just graphic design which in recent years has pretty much fused with what we consider to be art…

  • First time writer, long time reader

    Shit comment Ian.
    The amount of middle class tourists clamouring over themselves to take a photo of a painting is not a measure of what good art is.

    It’s ok not to like modern art. It’s not ok to pretend like you’ve got some greater insight than anyone else, particularly when the best you can come up with is a comparison to two of the most obvious artists in history.

    But, if this is not making sense to you Ian, feel free to roll back to the good old days, endulge in your bona 4 mona, and drink from the only new and worthy addition to art since da Vinci’s last canvas:
    http://www.zazzle.com.au/art_be_wear_mug-168891548947051533#commentAnchor

  • First time writer, long time r

    Shit comment Ian.
    The amount of middle class tourists clamouring over themselves to take a photo of a painting is not a measure of what good art is.

    It’s ok not to like modern art. It’s not ok to pretend like you’ve got some greater insight than anyone else, particularly when the best you can come up with is a comparison to two of the most obvious artists in history.

    But, if this is not making sense to you Ian, feel free to roll back to the good old days, endulge in your bona 4 mona, and drink from the only new and worthy addition to art since da Vinci’s last canvas:
    http://www.zazzle.com.au/art_be_wear_mug-168891548947051533#commentAnchor

  • First time writer, long time r

    Shit comment Ian.
    The amount of middle class tourists clamouring over themselves to take a photo of a painting is not a measure of what good art is.

    It’s ok not to like modern art. It’s not ok to pretend like you’ve got some greater insight than anyone else, particularly when the best you can come up with is a comparison to two of the most obvious artists in history.

    But, if this is not making sense to you Ian, feel free to roll back to the good old days, endulge in your bona 4 mona, and drink from the only new and worthy addition to art since da Vinci’s last canvas:
    http://www.zazzle.com.au/art_be_wear_mug-168891548947051533#commentAnchor

  • spaceboy

    seriously, when did this site become wooster collective?

  • spaceboy

    seriously, when did this site become wooster collective?

  • spaceboy

    seriously, when did this site become wooster collective?

  • TONY G

    cool stuff

  • TONY G

    cool stuff

  • TONY G

    cool stuff

  • Ian

    Ah yes, bad modern art.

    I wonder whether people will be clamouring over themselves to view this sort of work in art galleries in a century like we do the Mona Lisa, or any Monet?

  • Ian

    Ah yes, bad modern art.

    I wonder whether people will be clamouring over themselves to view this sort of work in art galleries in a century like we do the Mona Lisa, or any Monet?

  • Ian

    Ah yes, bad modern art.

    I wonder whether people will be clamouring over themselves to view this sort of work in art galleries in a century like we do the Mona Lisa, or any Monet?