Comments on: Andy Warhol’s Still-Life Polaroids Exhibition http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/ Online Magazine for Fashion, Sneakers, and Culture Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ckit http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-37264 ckit Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:38:38 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-37264 I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art. If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you'd all be singing a different tune. Just because it's Andy Warhol doesn't mean it's amazing... These are shit. Totally uninspiring. I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art.

If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you’d all be singing a different tune. Just because it’s Andy Warhol doesn’t mean it’s amazing… These are shit. Totally uninspiring.

]]> By: ckit http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269395 ckit Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:38:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269395 I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art. If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you'd all be singing a different tune. Just because it's Andy Warhol doesn't mean it's amazing... These are shit. Totally uninspiring. I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art.

If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you’d all be singing a different tune. Just because it’s Andy Warhol doesn’t mean it’s amazing… These are shit. Totally uninspiring.

]]> By: ckit http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269396 ckit Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:38:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269396 I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art. If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you'd all be singing a different tune. Just because it's Andy Warhol doesn't mean it's amazing... These are shit. Totally uninspiring. I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art.

If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you’d all be singing a different tune. Just because it’s Andy Warhol doesn’t mean it’s amazing… These are shit. Totally uninspiring.

]]> By: walker44444 http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-33746 walker44444 Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:11:21 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-33746 Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself. Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met. So, get over it folks - don't believe the hype. Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself.

Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met.

So, get over it folks – don’t believe the hype.

]]> By: walker44444 http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269393 walker44444 Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:11:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269393 Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself. Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met. So, get over it folks - don't believe the hype. Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself.

Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met.

So, get over it folks – don’t believe the hype.

]]> By: walker44444 http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269394 walker44444 Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:11:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269394 Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself. Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met. So, get over it folks - don't believe the hype. Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself.

Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met.

So, get over it folks – don’t believe the hype.

]]> By: yatzer http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-33538 yatzer Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:37:01 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-33538 If these images weren't Andy Warhol’s, I'm sure that they would worth nothing! If these images weren’t Andy Warhol’s, I’m sure that they would worth nothing!

]]> By: yatzer http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269391 yatzer Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:37:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269391 If these images weren't Andy Warhol’s, I'm sure that they would worth nothing! If these images weren’t Andy Warhol’s, I’m sure that they would worth nothing!

]]> By: yatzer http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-269392 yatzer Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:37:00 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-269392 If these images weren't Andy Warhol’s, I'm sure that they would worth nothing! If these images weren’t Andy Warhol’s, I’m sure that they would worth nothing!

]]> By: arya http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-32250 arya Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:00:28 +0000 http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-32250 so what if the picture quality isnt as good as what is available now? It is art, not an advertisement for polaroid cameras. With that attitude you might as well just say that artists like monet and van gogh were shit too just because their paintings were blurry or unrealistic compared to what a 24 megapixel digital camera could do today. Thats a given! But im pretty sure the gallery isn't featuring the photos because of the technology but because andy warhol is a very important modern artist who has had an influence on tons of other artists and his fans might want to see these polaroids. so what if the picture quality isnt as good as what is available now? It is art, not an advertisement for polaroid cameras. With that attitude you might as well just say that artists like monet and van gogh were shit too just because their paintings were blurry or unrealistic compared to what a 24 megapixel digital camera could do today. Thats a given! But im pretty sure the gallery isn’t featuring the photos because of the technology but because andy warhol is a very important modern artist who has had an influence on tons of other artists and his fans might want to see these polaroids.

]]>