<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Warhol’s Still-Life Polaroids Exhibition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/</link>
	<description>Online Magazine for Fashion, Sneakers, and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:51:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ckit</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-37264</link>
		<dc:creator>ckit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-37264</guid>
		<description>I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art.

 If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you&#039;d all be singing a different tune.  Just because it&#039;s Andy Warhol doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s amazing... These are shit.  Totally uninspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took pictures like this with my first Polaroid cam before I was even introduced to art.</p>
<p> If someone else had snapped these 30~ years ago you&#8217;d all be singing a different tune.  Just because it&#8217;s Andy Warhol doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s amazing&#8230; These are shit.  Totally uninspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walker44444</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-33746</link>
		<dc:creator>walker44444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-33746</guid>
		<description>Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself.

Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met. 

So, get over it folks - don&#039;t believe the hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warhol is a non-artist. The photos are dull and bland, just like the man himself.</p>
<p>Robert Hughes (art critic) once said that Warhol was one of the stupidest people that he had ever met. </p>
<p>So, get over it folks &#8211; don&#8217;t believe the hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yatzer</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-33538</link>
		<dc:creator>yatzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-33538</guid>
		<description>If these images weren&#039;t  Andy Warhol’s, I&#039;m  sure that they would worth nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these images weren&#8217;t  Andy Warhol’s, I&#8217;m  sure that they would worth nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arya</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-32250</link>
		<dc:creator>arya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-32250</guid>
		<description>so what if the picture quality isnt as good as what is available now? It is art, not an advertisement for polaroid cameras. With that attitude you might as well just say that artists like monet and van gogh were shit too just because their paintings were blurry or unrealistic compared to what a 24 megapixel digital camera could do today. Thats a given! But im pretty sure the gallery isn&#039;t featuring the photos because of the technology but because andy warhol is a very important modern artist who has had an influence on tons of other artists and his fans might want to see these polaroids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what if the picture quality isnt as good as what is available now? It is art, not an advertisement for polaroid cameras. With that attitude you might as well just say that artists like monet and van gogh were shit too just because their paintings were blurry or unrealistic compared to what a 24 megapixel digital camera could do today. Thats a given! But im pretty sure the gallery isn&#8217;t featuring the photos because of the technology but because andy warhol is a very important modern artist who has had an influence on tons of other artists and his fans might want to see these polaroids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BEN//STRONG LOOK</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31756</link>
		<dc:creator>BEN//STRONG LOOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31756</guid>
		<description>totally sweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally sweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi von Sydow</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31638</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi von Sydow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31638</guid>
		<description>Wicked pictures my friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked pictures my friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Count</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31386</link>
		<dc:creator>The Count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31386</guid>
		<description>Tim, comparing pictures taken in the year 2009 and back between 1977 and 1983 is beyond retarded. It&#039;s like comparing apples and oranges.

Just saying without Warhol you little shits most likely wouldn&#039;t be interested in art at all. He changed the game forever.

Creative innovator = Icon status. Respect your elders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, comparing pictures taken in the year 2009 and back between 1977 and 1983 is beyond retarded. It&#8217;s like comparing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>Just saying without Warhol you little shits most likely wouldn&#8217;t be interested in art at all. He changed the game forever.</p>
<p>Creative innovator = Icon status. Respect your elders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timrollsx</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31353</link>
		<dc:creator>timrollsx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31353</guid>
		<description>For his time these photos were probably revolutionary i don&#039;t really think you can compare today&#039;s work to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For his time these photos were probably revolutionary i don&#8217;t really think you can compare today&#8217;s work to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NVA</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31286</link>
		<dc:creator>NVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31286</guid>
		<description>the shoes collection are nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the shoes collection are nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramage</title>
		<link>http://hypebeast.com/2009/01/andy-warhol%e2%80%99s-still-life-polaroids-exhibition/#comment-31263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypebeast.com/?p=64464#comment-31263</guid>
		<description>The shaving blade is unreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shaving blade is unreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
